Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Tools > Mathematics
Reload this Page lepty jetty big bang
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
lepty jetty big bang
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,317
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 123x in 121 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
lepty jetty big bang - 02-17-2006, 12:13 PM

The title was made to rime with the 1968 movie ‘Chitty Chitty Bang Bang’ which was a fantasy sTOEry about an antigravitic jalopy. But this post is really about a proposed quantization of directional properties at the local infinitesimal domain of space-time.

Quantum chromodynamics (QCD) gradually became a full-fledged theory of elementary particles since it was proposed by David Gross and Frank Wilczek in 1973. Consequently, the proposed solution of asymptotic freedom by Gross and Wilczek, and independently by David Politzer further elucidate the conceptual puzzles of event interaction duality in ultra-high energy of electron and positron collisions. CERN's Linear electron and positron (LEP) and Stanford's SLAC colliders detected two distinct product groups of interaction events (1) the leptonic (lepty) events and (2) the quark-gluon (jetty) events. Since the main collision components are leptons common sense should suggest only leptonic products. However, compelling experimental evidence indicates otherwise. Bootstrap philosophy couldn’t offer much consolation for the mathematically minded. And to say that the world is what it is because it is what it was does not completely satisfy but those who strongly believe in a cosmological anthropic principle.

Now from a mathematical point of view it can be proposed that local infinitesimal degrees of freedom are quantizable. Without time, three-dimensional space (3D) has six degrees of freedom (dof). 2D space is 4-dof and 1D space is 2-dof. 1D time is also 2-dof. Therefore the maximum dof for local infinitesimal space-time is eight. Since dof are integrable similar to vector quantities, in the global macroscopic domain, the numbers of dof are greater than eight and could easily become unbounded approaching the smoothness of a continuous field. Nonetheless, the field’s dof remains quantized in the local infinitesimal domain of space-time. It is this directional quantization for all degrees of freedom which makes all the effective quantum field theories possible.

Postscript: Gross, Wilczek and Politzer shared the 2004 Nobel Prize in Physics
see http://nobelprize.org/physics/laureates/2004/


Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

Last edited by AntonioLao : 02-17-2006 at 12:48 PM. Reason: SLAC and 2004 Nobel Prize in Physics
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
02-17-2006, 03:09 PM

How could the 'disposition for motion' be quantized? I mean, spacetime could be quantized. But the way to move through them, to be extended through them, made of particles? It's a strange idea but revolutionary atleast. Maybe we're all made of two types of particles: matter-particles, which are the quarks and electrons, and the dof-particles, which are not quanta of spacetime, but quanta of 'having extension' on spacetime.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
local infinitesimally speaking
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,317
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 123x in 121 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
local infinitesimally speaking - 02-20-2006, 12:21 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
How could the 'disposition for motion' be quantized?
The disposition is nonlinear analogous to rotational motion and constant angular acceleration similar to polarization of electromagnetism. Polarization is quantized.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Big Bang disproved? battybat Cosmology 44 02-21-2008 02:27 PM
Empty Nest - possible or not possible aspect of Big Bang? Fredrick Cosmology 17 03-22-2007 01:36 AM
A question concerning the Big Bang. Dragongod General Physics 71 12-29-2005 12:08 PM
2005-05-01: What Existed Before the Big Bang? Robert Chat Sessions 13 04-30-2005 03:05 AM
Materialization before Big Bang Fredrick Cosmology 51 04-03-2005 02:43 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com