ToeQuest

We're going on a TOE Quest!


Register

Reply

Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
02-27-2006, 02:31 PM
collision, scattering, connectivity

Is it meaningful to discuss these concepts when analyzing local infinitesimal region of space-time? Can these concepts be used to describe completely and effectively the true nature of fields and quanta or waves and particles? The true nature of a space-time quantum is that of a wavicle (containing both effective properties of wave and particle). These wavicles are squares of energy represent able by Hadamard matrices or by inner and outer products of differential vectors. The state of a wavicle is denoted by x and Ñ·Ñx=0 or Ѳx=0. This suggests that the Laplacian or the divergence of the gradient of the scalar function x is identically zero. It implies the existence of local infinitesimal orthogonal primary forces such that the inner scalar dot product of any of these primary forces is also identically zero F·F=F²=0.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
4th degree Black Belt

baudrunner's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 587
Blog Entries: 6
18 baudrunner is a jewel in the rough
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
02-27-2006, 03:15 PM
Antonio,

None of these kinds of posts really make a whole lot of sense to anyone unless you provide a preamble including a glossary of definitions, for example..

for the purpose of this discussion:
x = the state of a wavicle (?) I don't know how to quantify state.
F = orthogonal primary force(?) why orthogonal, something to do with 2³?
Ñ = some kind of energy? ergs, dynes, electron volts?

I'm all for establishing a rule that any post which includes equations using variables whose meanings are not immediately evident must be accompanied by a glossary of terms.

Anyway, I still remember something from my school days called Brownian Motion. There is no stillness in reality, all particles right down to the smallest one vibrate, ie they are always in motion and they vibrate at their own resonant frequency. Not only do they vibrate but some have spin and angular momentum, which are responsible for producing their own resonant frequency. When the combined oscillations of the reinforced and destructive energy waves that they produce are observed at the level of the macro scale their combined effect produces reality, and at the level of particles their individual properties as evidenced by scattering after colliding with other particles are displayed for us to see regardless of their interpretation. It's pretty hard to escape the fact that discrete particles exist within their own domain, and that the wavicle is an esoteric product of the mind based on a misconstruction of the empirical observations of experimental results demonstrating wave and particle behaviour, all of which can be easily explained on practical examination.

Fact is, we can take a chip from some large object and reduce it to its elemental composition and analyse it moleculary as containing so many molecules of so many elements made of so many atoms which are composed of this many discrete particles etc etc. The puzzle is in what is a particle and how are their oscillations produced, never mind their properties of frequency or mass or charge? All the quantization in the world doesn't get us any closer to the TOE. Nothing is still, but everything still remains.
__________________
"There is nothing permanent except change"

Last edited by baudrunner; 02-27-2006 at 03:21 PM. Reason: content
Reply With Quote
baudrunner is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
02-27-2006, 03:29 PM
reply later

my reply will be the same time next day.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Moderator

mkirkpatrick's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,749
Blog Entries: 4
103 mkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud of
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
02-27-2006, 08:45 PM
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Is it meaningful to discuss these concepts when analyzing local infinitesimal region of space-time? Can these concepts be used to describe completely and effectively the true nature of fields and quanta or waves and particles? The true nature of a space-time quantum is that of a wavicle (containing both effective properties of wave and particle). These wavicles are squares of energy represent able by Hadamard matrices or by inner and outer products of differential vectors. The state of a wavicle is denoted by x and Ñ·Ñx=0 or Ѳx=0. This suggests that the Laplacian or the divergence of the gradient of the scalar function x is identically zero. It implies the existence of local infinitesimal orthogonal primary forces such that the inner scalar dot product of any of these primary forces is also identically zero F·F=F²=0.
Surely Antonio,what links all these wavicles,and particles,and is
responsible for the interconnectivity of it all,is,the great law of harmonics,
which constantly strives for "wave harmony",its "nature" is to produce a
Symphony,to have all in concert!It does not always suceed,but it tries?
Kind regards michael.
__________________
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Reply With Quote
mkirkpatrick is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
02-28-2006, 01:31 PM
space and time independence

Quote:
Originally Posted by baudrunner
All the quantization in the world doesn't get us any closer to the TOE. Nothing is still, but everything still remains.
Not if the theoretical descriptions are based on space and time independence such as what the square of energy is capable of doing.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
causal connectivity AntonioLao Cosmology 4 09-19-2005 01:24 PM
Collision & Space Travel centaurwind Relativity 4 05-28-2005 11:17 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:23 PM. Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 VBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys.