Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    collision, scattering, connectivity

    Is it meaningful to discuss these concepts when analyzing local infinitesimal region of space-time? Can these concepts be used to describe completely and effectively the true nature of fields and quanta or waves and particles? The true nature of a space-time quantum is that of a wavicle (containing both effective properties of wave and particle). These wavicles are squares of energy represent able by Hadamard matrices or by inner and outer products of differential vectors. The state of a wavicle is denoted by x and Ñ·Ñx=0 or Ѳx=0. This suggests that the Laplacian or the divergence of the gradient of the scalar function x is identically zero. It implies the existence of local infinitesimal orthogonal primary forces such that the inner scalar dot product of any of these primary forces is also identically zero F·F=F²=0.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    4th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    589
    Blog Entries
    6
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    31
    Antonio,

    None of these kinds of posts really make a whole lot of sense to anyone unless you provide a preamble including a glossary of definitions, for example..

    for the purpose of this discussion:
    x = the state of a wavicle (?) I don't know how to quantify state.
    F = orthogonal primary force(?) why orthogonal, something to do with 2³?
    Ñ = some kind of energy? ergs, dynes, electron volts?

    I'm all for establishing a rule that any post which includes equations using variables whose meanings are not immediately evident must be accompanied by a glossary of terms.

    Anyway, I still remember something from my school days called Brownian Motion. There is no stillness in reality, all particles right down to the smallest one vibrate, ie they are always in motion and they vibrate at their own resonant frequency. Not only do they vibrate but some have spin and angular momentum, which are responsible for producing their own resonant frequency. When the combined oscillations of the reinforced and destructive energy waves that they produce are observed at the level of the macro scale their combined effect produces reality, and at the level of particles their individual properties as evidenced by scattering after colliding with other particles are displayed for us to see regardless of their interpretation. It's pretty hard to escape the fact that discrete particles exist within their own domain, and that the wavicle is an esoteric product of the mind based on a misconstruction of the empirical observations of experimental results demonstrating wave and particle behaviour, all of which can be easily explained on practical examination.

    Fact is, we can take a chip from some large object and reduce it to its elemental composition and analyse it moleculary as containing so many molecules of so many elements made of so many atoms which are composed of this many discrete particles etc etc. The puzzle is in what is a particle and how are their oscillations produced, never mind their properties of frequency or mass or charge? All the quantization in the world doesn't get us any closer to the TOE. Nothing is still, but everything still remains.
    Last edited by baudrunner; 02-27-2006 at 02:21 PM. Reason: content
    "There is nothing permanent except change"

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    reply later

    my reply will be the same time next day.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    Is it meaningful to discuss these concepts when analyzing local infinitesimal region of space-time? Can these concepts be used to describe completely and effectively the true nature of fields and quanta or waves and particles? The true nature of a space-time quantum is that of a wavicle (containing both effective properties of wave and particle). These wavicles are squares of energy represent able by Hadamard matrices or by inner and outer products of differential vectors. The state of a wavicle is denoted by x and Ñ·Ñx=0 or Ѳx=0. This suggests that the Laplacian or the divergence of the gradient of the scalar function x is identically zero. It implies the existence of local infinitesimal orthogonal primary forces such that the inner scalar dot product of any of these primary forces is also identically zero F·F=F²=0.
    Surely Antonio,what links all these wavicles,and particles,and is
    responsible for the interconnectivity of it all,is,the great law of harmonics,
    which constantly strives for "wave harmony",its "nature" is to produce a
    Symphony,to have all in concert!It does not always suceed,but it tries?
    Kind regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    space and time independence

    Quote Originally Posted by baudrunner
    All the quantization in the world doesn't get us any closer to the TOE. Nothing is still, but everything still remains.
    Not if the theoretical descriptions are based on space and time independence such as what the square of energy is capable of doing.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. causal connectivity
    By AntonioLao in forum Cosmology
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-19-2005, 12:24 PM
  2. Collision & Space Travel
    By centaurwind in forum Relativity
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-28-2005, 10:17 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top