Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    decreasing return

    When a number which is less than unity (e.g. 0.999999999999…) are multiplied by itself the product is a smaller number. If this process continues, the succeeding products become less and less and get closer and closer to zero. If the process is repeated infinitely then the final product is identically zero. In probability theory, this is equivalent to finding the probability of independent events.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile mind is back of thought is it not!

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    When a number which is less than unity (e.g. 0.999999999999…) are multiplied by itself the product is a smaller number. If this process continues, the succeeding products become less and less and get closer and closer to zero. If the process is repeated infinitely then the final product is identically zero. In probability theory, this is equivalent to finding the probability of independent events.
    What then would this
    independent event be? The discovery that mind is back of all!


    kind regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    6th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    844
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 2x in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    32

    Cool hmmm....

    so, if the probability of finding independent events approaches (or becomes) zero, is this math tending to prove the All is Infinite?
    The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears

  4. #4
    4th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    589
    Blog Entries
    6
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    31
    I think it is attempting to prove that all is disappearing.
    "There is nothing permanent except change"

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    singular existence

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    What then would this independent event be?
    If this independent event is that of an individual existence then the probability that I exist independently of everyone else approaches zero as the number of independent existence (separate individual) approaches infinity. The population of the world is more than 6 billions and counting http://www.ibiblio.org/lunarbin/worldpop therefore the probability of my existence is 1 divided by this number of people of the world or the uncountable life in the universe. However, within immediate family group or peers, my probability of existence is higher.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #6
    6th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    844
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 2x in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    32

    Cool math is hard...

    Antonio is that calculation probability of individual personhood or probability of life? If so, don't you have to have the denominator include all life, not just humans?
    The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears

  7. #7
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by harmonygirl
    don't you have to have the denominator include all life, not just humans?
    Inclusively, yes. Exclusively as human beings was my intended idea for the demonstration. Yet I am not sure we are alone in the universe?
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  8. #8
    6th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    844
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 2x in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    32

    Cool my bad

    Actually Antonio, that would be a great thread! Okay, I took your statement to be inclusive (that your existence was not only independent of all Earthlings but also from all other life).
    The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears

  9. #9
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    invisible members

    what is the probability of existence for those invisible members of TOEQUEST since not many of them have posted?
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  10. #10
    6th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    844
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 2x in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    32

    Cool because it's scary...

    LOL! I am an optimist, so I don't think it would approach infinity. I think it can be intimidating to post,especially if you are not occupied with these matters routinely. I know that because this is a hobby for me and not what i studied at school, nor what I do for a living, I had moments of hesitation before I posted.
    The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. number of souls in the universe
    By AntonioLao in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 93
    Last Post: 11-02-2007, 06:18 PM
  2. The Return to Classical Physics
    By vacuum-mechanics in forum General Physics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-22-2004, 05:08 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top