LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksThe mathematical principle of infinite series is based on convergence. This convergence is connected to the order of the terms in the series. Depending on these orderings, the same convergent infinite series can become divergent (vice versa) by the drop of a hat or any rearrangement or realignment of its terms. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Series.html
Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 10 of 18
Thread: limited sum rule
- 03-07-2006, 02:06 PM #1Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
limited sum rule
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 02-23-2007, 09:39 PM #2Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,619
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 295
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: limited sum rule The limit is surely you understanding,is it not?
Originally Posted by AntonioLao 
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 02-26-2007, 01:38 PM #3Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: limited sum rule
Same as saying that nothing add up. Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 02-26-2007, 08:14 PM #4Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,619
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 295
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: limited sum rule Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Your not wrong there?Nothing adds up to less than more!
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 02-28-2007, 05:04 PM #5Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: limited sum rule
the probability of disbelief is almost always greater than one. Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 02-28-2007, 06:48 PM #6Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,619
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 295
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: limited sum rule If the sum was limited,would this reflect on the rule? Originally Posted by AntonioLao
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 03-01-2007, 12:05 PM #7Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: limited sum rule
If the sum was limited then it is considered as a perturbation or approximation. But if the limit exists for an infinite series then the sum is exactly finite and convergent. Most series are divergent to infinities requiring renormalization techniques. Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 03-01-2007, 09:00 PM #8Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,619
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 295
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: limited sum rule Would that then apply here? Originally Posted by AntonioLao
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 03-02-2007, 03:57 PM #9Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: limited sum rule
Only by renormalization. see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renormalization Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 03-02-2007, 05:57 PM #10Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,619
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 295
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: limited sum rule I have often felt that I needed renormalization as a tool for balanced thinking. Originally Posted by AntonioLao
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Reply With QuoteThread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.11
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:33 AM.
vBulletin 4.0 skin by CompleteVB
