Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Tools > Mathematics
Reload this Page fractal equality (freedom)
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
fractal equality (freedom)
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
fractal equality (freedom) - 03-21-2006, 01:03 PM

Cracks in dried, settled, dehydrated concrete are downright annoying for any construction project. In addition to the obvious sign of imperfection, they give doubts for the project’s designed stability. Common sense usually dictates that stability is tantamount to durability. However, dynamic stability is really due to an inherent inequality. For the fundamental principle of all natural processes is to move toward equality and at the local infinitesimal level obeying an absolute maxim that equality repels and inequality attracts. It is this property that became the prime mover for the existence of local infinitesimal motion (LIM). Hence, if the probability of all random vacuum fluctuations is exactly zero, and if the absolute temperature of the vacuum is also exactly zero then and only then can true absolute equality and true absolute freedom exist.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Maybe it's not inequality, maybe it's a constant struggling for balance?
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
6th degree Black Belt
harmonygirl will become famous soon enough
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 844
Thanks Given: 43
Thanked 15x in 15 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep Power: 19
   
Cool Maybe it's not inequality, maybe it's a constant struggling for balance? - 03-21-2006, 03:54 PM

This is interesting Antonio. I am not sure I understand the term "dynamic stability"? I get you are using the terms "equality" and "freedom" in a different manner than usual. If not, I am not sure I agree with either the notion of "true absolute equality" or "true absolute freedom". How can an inherently imperfect world support these?


The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
03-22-2006, 01:58 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by harmonygirl
I am not sure I understand the term "dynamic stability"?
This term is loosely connected to dynamic equilibrium. see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_equilibrium. Equality is used here to hypothesize about the existence of primary local infinitesimal orthogonal forces. And freedom is related to the concept of degree of freedom.
Quote:
Originally Posted by harmonygirl
How can an inherently imperfect world support these?
It is supported by the existence of a quantum of length. See other post about 'apothem'.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Could GOD be represented through fractal formations? Maximus Parthas Intelligent Design 12 03-01-2007 08:01 AM
fractal charge attraction=attention? dan winter Neuroscience 3 01-09-2007 07:22 PM
equality or not – that is the question AntonioLao Mathematics 8 02-20-2006 12:33 PM
double irrotational freedom AntonioLao Your TOE Theory 5 01-21-2006 03:32 PM
Speed Intelligence and Fractal Dialectics Mike 5 Introductions 3 11-06-2005 01:06 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com