Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    approaching infinity

    Mathematical logic says that a periodic function can be expanded by using Fourier series as a sum of discrete components of trigonometric sine and cosine terms. However, if and only if the period approaches infinty can its transform pairs exist. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fast_Fourier_transform and http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FourierTransform.html
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    6th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    844
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 2x in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    32

    Cool

    Antonio,
    This is over my head. Can you explain what it means?
    The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears

  3. #3
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile There are no maps in the borderlands.

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    Mathematical logic says that a periodic function can be expanded by using Fourier series as a sum of discrete components of trigonometric sine and cosine terms. However, if and only if the period approaches infinty can its transform pairs exist. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fast_Fourier_transform and http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FourierTransform.html
    An idea has
    arose in my mind here Antonio,approaching infinity,and thereby entering an
    ubiquitous field,you would be in the "border land" between on,and off?Motion
    would meet its Doppleganger motionlessness!Ultra fast would meet ultra slow
    and would in effect cancel each other out!The transform pairs you mention
    are I believe sub atomic vortices.Maybe you could dig out a equation from
    here Antonio,that could be used on the key to the TOE thread.!

    kind regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  4. #4
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by harmonygirl
    This is over my head. Can you explain what it means?
    Using a biological analogy, the transform pairs are just like male and female. Both are needed for further propagation of the species in question. In wave propagation there are also pairs of positive and negative waves.
    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    Maybe you could dig out a equation from here
    The wave equation of classical electromagnetic field has been quite successful when applied to quantum mechanics http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_equation and http://www.geocities.com/aboutwaves/
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  5. #5
    6th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    844
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 2x in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    32

    Cool alice would be amused...

    Positive and negative waves? I fell through the looking glass on that one. Are these negative and positive in relation to each other or to another frame of reference? So in your first post, are you saying that these 'pairs' only exist once the period approaches infinity?
    The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears

  6. #6
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    looking for the proper terminology

    Quote Originally Posted by harmonygirl
    Are these negative and positive in relation to each other or to another frame of reference?
    Here again, I am having problem finding the proper terminology for describing positive and negative frequency. The best analogy is clockwise and counterclockwise rotations. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourier_transform and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spatial_frequency and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_number and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angular_frequency and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Is there an absolute Principle?
    By mkirkpatrick in forum Logic and Reasoning
    Replies: 179
    Last Post: 07-04-2011, 04:22 PM
  2. Infinity
    By Andy in forum Your TOE Theory
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-19-2009, 12:25 PM
  3. Fractal Dialectics
    By Mike 5 in forum Theorems and Conjectures
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 01-05-2006, 12:48 PM
  4. irrationality and infinity
    By AntonioLao in forum Your TOE Theory
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-17-2005, 04:54 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top