ToeQuest

We're going on a TOE Quest!


Register

Reply

Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
03-28-2006, 03:02 PM
approaching zero

Mathematical logic says that continuous linear functions of independent time variable can be contracted by using Newton’s fluxion as a product of time differences. However, for every multiplicand or multiplier there is the numerator or dividend and for every dividend there has to be a divisor. Yet in order for these final multiple derivatives to exist and to become meaningful the denominators must all be necessarily approach the values of zero as required by a mathematical theory of limits. These seem to imply that relative zeros are mathematically meaningful, but what about absolute zeros? Or that is a quantity that is exactly zero? If this quantity is that of a force then a value of zero implies the existence of equal and opposite forces. For them to be conservative they must repel each other.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Moderator

mkirkpatrick's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,749
Blog Entries: 4
103 mkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud of
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
03-29-2006, 12:29 AM
Smile lets go beyond zero!

Antonio,You have given me a wonderful idea,and I thank you for it.
Approaching zero could be seen as one who has become enlightened!Almost
like the binary idea of,off,or on,or 1and zero,as the individual approaches the
state of Samadhi,as I have posted on another thread,the one being I is
transformed,transfigured,and translated,and would if the process were to
remain focussed,result in the individual being no more,and would loose the
atomic cohesion that "held" him in place,thereby resulting in the one
becoming zero!!!What do you think Antonio?

kind regards michael.
__________________
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Reply With Quote
mkirkpatrick is offlineReport Post
6th degree Black Belt

Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 844
Blog Entries: 3
19 harmonygirl will become famous soon enough
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
03-29-2006, 12:39 AM
Cool

Michael, would this be absolute zero?
__________________
The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears
Reply With Quote
harmonygirl is offlineReport Post
4th degree Black Belt

Mohan.C's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 501
Blog Entries: 8
20 Mohan.C is a glorious beacon of lightMohan.C is a glorious beacon of light
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
03-29-2006, 07:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Mathematical logic says that continuous linear functions of independent time variable can be contracted by using Newton’s fluxion as a product of time differences. However, for every multiplicand or multiplier there is the numerator or dividend and for every dividend there has to be a divisor. Yet in order for these final multiple derivatives to exist and to become meaningful the denominators must all be necessarily approach the values of zero as required by a mathematical theory of limits. These seem to imply that relative zeros are mathematically meaningful, but what about absolute zeros? Or that is a quantity that is exactly zero? If this quantity is that of a force then a value of zero implies the existence of equal and opposite forces. For them to be conservative they must repel each other.
I have differentiation this year I think you are speaking of the change in the independent variable tending to zero. But however I want to ask whether time could be zero we took time=0 to find initial velocity and things like that. But I really could not think of time as 0.

And what does the first sentence mean(ie. what is newton's fluxion)?
__________________
Anything for Everyone!
Reply With Quote
Mohan.C is offlineReport Post
Moderator

mkirkpatrick's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,749
Blog Entries: 4
103 mkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud of
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
03-29-2006, 11:47 AM
Smile Whos this Kelvin guy!

Quote:
Originally Posted by harmonygirl
Michael, would this be absolute zero?
Yes it would,but it would not be in the Kelvin degree?


kind regards michael.
__________________
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Reply With Quote
mkirkpatrick is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
03-29-2006, 01:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
thereby resulting in the one becoming zero!!!
I was thinking about the property of mass being zero like the photon's rest mass even though it has kinetic energy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mohan.C
what is newton's fluxion
Definition of a derivative (Newtonian differential calculus vs. Leibniz's integral calculus) with respect to time.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
approaching infinity AntonioLao Mathematics 5 03-29-2006 01:15 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:44 PM. Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 VBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys.