ToeQuest

We're going on a TOE Quest!


Register

Reply

Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
04-05-2006, 03:06 PM
circular dysfunction

It can be shown by using the vertical line test that a circle in the Cartesian plane is not a function. So are all the ellipses, and hyperbolas. However, the parabolas are equivalent to all quadratic functions. Therefore, for the conic sections of degenerate lines, parabolas, circles, ellipses, and hyperbolas it is 3 to 2 in favor of dysfunctionality. This realization could then be used to assert that for a two dimensional universe, it is more dysfunctional than it is functional. Moreover, since the circle represents a two dimensional sphere of four degrees of freedom and by mathematical induction it is demonstrable that all multi-dimensional spheres are likewise dysfunctional. On the other hand, the functionality of circular trigonometric functions, namely sine and cosine, do implicitly assume piecewise functionality. For if one completes the circles as represented by standing waves, one finds that even the sines and cosines are all dysfunctional. Therefore, excluding all degenerate lines of conic sections, the 1/3 functionality and 2/3 dysfunctionality of physical reality is bounded by fractal edges between order and chaos, between sanity and insanity.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
The Thinker

Guille's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,278
Blog Entries: 7
48 Guille is a jewel in the rough
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
04-05-2006, 06:39 PM
Those proportions (1/3 functionality:2/3 dysfunctionality) do they ahve to do with those we once discussed (it was something about protons or neutrons I can't remember well, but the two fractions involved were equal)?
Reply With Quote
Guille is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
04-06-2006, 01:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
do they ahve to do with those we once discussed
The absolute values of quarks' electric charges.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
The Thinker

Guille's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,278
Blog Entries: 7
48 Guille is a jewel in the rough
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
04-06-2006, 05:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
The absolute values of quarks' electric charges.
And does one impply the other? Is there interconnectivity?
Reply With Quote
Guille is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
04-07-2006, 03:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
And does one impply the other? Is there interconnectivity?
It implies that the antiuniverse is twice the size of this universe. Their interconnection is through the strong nuclear force at the Planck domain of length and energy.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
The Thinker

Guille's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,278
Blog Entries: 7
48 Guille is a jewel in the rough
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
04-08-2006, 04:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
It implies that the antiuniverse is twice the size of this universe. Their interconnection is through the strong nuclear force at the Planck domain of length and energy.
This is another proof of my theoretical basis of 'universal dna' MEFD. Energy is connected to space (length, in this case), and force is connected to time. What if we change 'the planck domain of length and energy' to 'the planck domain of time and force'? What does this mean for the interconnectivity and the universe-antiuniverse?
Reply With Quote
Guille is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
04-10-2006, 01:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
What if we change 'the planck domain of length and energy' to 'the planck domain of time and force'? What does this mean for the interconnectivity and the universe-antiuniverse?
Physically, length multiply force is energy. Energy multiply time is another alternate description of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. Quantized space is time independence, therefore it contains only length and force. For mass independence, the invariance of square of light speed contains only length and absolute acceleration.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
function vs dysfunction AntonioLao Mathematics 8 04-10-2006 02:01 PM
implied dysfunction in Von Neumann’s theory AntonioLao Mathematics 5 04-06-2006 01:46 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:44 PM. Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 VBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys.