Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    circular dysfunction

    It can be shown by using the vertical line test that a circle in the Cartesian plane is not a function. So are all the ellipses, and hyperbolas. However, the parabolas are equivalent to all quadratic functions. Therefore, for the conic sections of degenerate lines, parabolas, circles, ellipses, and hyperbolas it is 3 to 2 in favor of dysfunctionality. This realization could then be used to assert that for a two dimensional universe, it is more dysfunctional than it is functional. Moreover, since the circle represents a two dimensional sphere of four degrees of freedom and by mathematical induction it is demonstrable that all multi-dimensional spheres are likewise dysfunctional. On the other hand, the functionality of circular trigonometric functions, namely sine and cosine, do implicitly assume piecewise functionality. For if one completes the circles as represented by standing waves, one finds that even the sines and cosines are all dysfunctional. Therefore, excluding all degenerate lines of conic sections, the 1/3 functionality and 2/3 dysfunctionality of physical reality is bounded by fractal edges between order and chaos, between sanity and insanity.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Those proportions (1/3 functionality:2/3 dysfunctionality) do they ahve to do with those we once discussed (it was something about protons or neutrons I can't remember well, but the two fractions involved were equal)?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    do they ahve to do with those we once discussed
    The absolute values of quarks' electric charges.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    The absolute values of quarks' electric charges.
    And does one impply the other? Is there interconnectivity?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    And does one impply the other? Is there interconnectivity?
    It implies that the antiuniverse is twice the size of this universe. Their interconnection is through the strong nuclear force at the Planck domain of length and energy.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #6
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    It implies that the antiuniverse is twice the size of this universe. Their interconnection is through the strong nuclear force at the Planck domain of length and energy.
    This is another proof of my theoretical basis of 'universal dna' MEFD. Energy is connected to space (length, in this case), and force is connected to time. What if we change 'the planck domain of length and energy' to 'the planck domain of time and force'? What does this mean for the interconnectivity and the universe-antiuniverse?

  7. #7
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    What if we change 'the planck domain of length and energy' to 'the planck domain of time and force'? What does this mean for the interconnectivity and the universe-antiuniverse?
    Physically, length multiply force is energy. Energy multiply time is another alternate description of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. Quantized space is time independence, therefore it contains only length and force. For mass independence, the invariance of square of light speed contains only length and absolute acceleration.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. function vs dysfunction
    By AntonioLao in forum Mathematics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-10-2006, 01:01 PM
  2. implied dysfunction in Von Neumann’s theory
    By AntonioLao in forum Mathematics
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-06-2006, 12:46 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top