[AntonioLao]

The main reason Feynman’s theory of the positrons (see Physical Review, Vol. 76, p749, received April 8, 1949) is logicallu plausible is its assumption of temporal independence. Whose beauty can only be symbolized by two one-dimensional, two degrees of freedom Hadamard matrices of the fundamental forms:

and

Furthermore these can be generalized to any degree of freedom or spacetime dimension for a theory of spacetime quantization.

[AntonioLao]

For those who are interested in reviewing the mathematical constructs of spacetime quantization, please see the pdf file at the weblink http://www.freefileupload.net/file.p...4680803/QS.PDF

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao The main reason Feynman’s theory of the positrons (see Physical Review, Vol. 76, p749, received April 8, 1949) is logicallu plausible is its assumption of temporal independence. Whose beauty can only be symbolized by two one-dimensional, two degrees of freedom Hadamard matrices of the fundamental forms: and Furthermore these can be generalized to any degree of freedom or spacetime dimension for a theory of spacetime quantization.

I am getting a positive tonal reaction from this Antonio!You are on to something here?
The wheel has gone full circle!

kind regards michael.

[Guille]

Can any kind of mass independence be symbolized by a two one-dimensional, two degrees of freedom Hadamard matrix of a fundamental form?

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by GUILLE Can any kind of mass independence be symbolized by a two one-dimensional...

Good question. But unfortunately mass independence is a scalar product of absolute acceleration and the spacetime metric giving a constant the square of light speed. Only vectors or quantities with directional property can be symbolized by Hadamard matrices. Note that these matrices are analogous to tensors and spinors and twistors with the exception that the components or elements are real numbers.