Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    mutually exclusive

    Anything less than infinity is suitable for a theory of probability. The visible universe including human consciousness is such a possibility. This lesser domain of a universal set, in the context of this discussion, would be called the sample spacetime, analogous to von Mises’ sample space of 1931 (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_von_Mises).

    In this spacetime sample there are countable spacetime events designated as E1, E2, E3, … and that any two are mutually exclusive if and only if they cannot both exist simultaneously. This does not make any sense for spacetime substantiation if the initial assumption is for all points to be indestructible. As spacetime points, they exist forever. There the meaning of existence is that of a process. If this process is gravity then the point with less mass moves toward the one with larger mass. If the masses are equal then they repel giving substance to the whole of spacetime. However, if this process is an orthogonal infinitesimal force and each point can be associated with only one such force then at the infinitesimal region only two such forces can be equal and opposite. Taking as a whole, spacetime is then infinitesimally divisible into an infinite order Hadamard matrix as positive and negative vacuum fields. The only implication is that matrices of the forms [math]\left(\begin{array}{cc}+1&+1\\+1&+1\end{array}\rig ht)[/math] and [math]\left(\begin{array}{cc}-1&-1\\-1&-1\end{array}\right)[/math] could not possibly exist but can only be represented by the null matrix [math]\left(\begin{array}{cc}0&0\\0&0\end{array}\right)[/math]. Nonetheless, the null matrix is more suitable for representing the operation of adding two Hadamard matrices of the same number of degree of freedom and dimension.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    The following attachment shows more about Hadamard matrices.
    Attachment 233
    Last edited by AntonioLao; 01-14-2008 at 03:38 PM.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Pauli and Dirac matrices

    The following attachment demonstrates the relationship between Pauli spin matrices and Dirac matrices to Hadamard matrices.

    Attachment 234
    Last edited by AntonioLao; 01-14-2008 at 03:41 PM.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    weblink

    A weblink describing mutually exclusive events of probability theory

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutually_exclusive
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  5. #5
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    The following attachment demonstrates the relationship between Pauli spin matrices and Dirac matrices to Hadamard matrices.

    Attachment 234
    Antonio,I have seen the attachments,it all
    looks very promising!You are doing a great job.


    kind regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  6. #6
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    fusion

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    I have seen the attachments,it all looks very promising!
    Thanks for your compliment. But I'm still struggling to figure out a way of using these Hadamard matrices to describe plasma state of matter and the possibility of initiating fusion reaction for a limitless source of energy for future generations.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Why was "RELATIVITY" born?
    By humanbydefault in forum Spacetime
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 04-07-2006, 12:10 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top