Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Tools > Mathematics
Reload this Page mutually exclusive
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
mutually exclusive
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,274
Thanks Given: 714
Thanked 121x in 119 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
mutually exclusive - 04-12-2006, 12:21 PM

Anything less than infinity is suitable for a theory of probability. The visible universe including human consciousness is such a possibility. This lesser domain of a universal set, in the context of this discussion, would be called the sample spacetime, analogous to von Mises’ sample space of 1931 (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_von_Mises).

In this spacetime sample there are countable spacetime events designated as E1, E2, E3, … and that any two are mutually exclusive if and only if they cannot both exist simultaneously. This does not make any sense for spacetime substantiation if the initial assumption is for all points to be indestructible. As spacetime points, they exist forever. There the meaning of existence is that of a process. If this process is gravity then the point with less mass moves toward the one with larger mass. If the masses are equal then they repel giving substance to the whole of spacetime. However, if this process is an orthogonal infinitesimal force and each point can be associated with only one such force then at the infinitesimal region only two such forces can be equal and opposite. Taking as a whole, spacetime is then infinitesimally divisible into an infinite order Hadamard matrix as positive and negative vacuum fields. The only implication is that matrices of the forms \left(\begin{array}{cc}+1&+1\\+1&+1\end{array}\right) and \left(\begin{array}{cc}-1&-1\\-1&-1\end{array}\right) could not possibly exist but can only be represented by the null matrix \left(\begin{array}{cc}0&0\\0&0\end{array}\right). Nonetheless, the null matrix is more suitable for representing the operation of adding two Hadamard matrices of the same number of degree of freedom and dimension.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,274
Thanks Given: 714
Thanked 121x in 119 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
04-12-2006, 12:34 PM

The following attachment shows more about Hadamard matrices.
Attachment 233


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

Last edited by AntonioLao : 01-14-2008 at 03:38 PM.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Pauli and Dirac matrices
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,274
Thanks Given: 714
Thanked 121x in 119 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
Pauli and Dirac matrices - 04-12-2006, 12:37 PM

The following attachment demonstrates the relationship between Pauli spin matrices and Dirac matrices to Hadamard matrices.

Attachment 234


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

Last edited by AntonioLao : 01-14-2008 at 03:41 PM.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
weblink
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,274
Thanks Given: 714
Thanked 121x in 119 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
weblink - 04-12-2006, 12:55 PM

A weblink describing mutually exclusive events of probability theory

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutually_exclusive


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,316
Thanks Given: 347
Thanked 687x in 645 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 94
   
Smile 04-12-2006, 01:02 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
The following attachment demonstrates the relationship between Pauli spin matrices and Dirac matrices to Hadamard matrices.

Attachment 234
Antonio,I have seen the attachments,it all
looks very promising!You are doing a great job.


kind regards michael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
fusion
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,274
Thanks Given: 714
Thanked 121x in 119 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
fusion - 04-12-2006, 01:14 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
I have seen the attachments,it all looks very promising!
Thanks for your compliment. But I'm still struggling to figure out a way of using these Hadamard matrices to describe plasma state of matter and the possibility of initiating fusion reaction for a limitless source of energy for future generations.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why was "RELATIVITY" born? humanbydefault Spacetime 20 04-07-2006 12:10 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com