Anything less than infinity is suitable for a theory of probability. The visible universe including human consciousness is such a possibility. This lesser domain of a universal set, in the context of this discussion, would be called the sample spacetime, analogous to von Mises’ sample space of 1931 (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_von_Mises).
In this spacetime sample there are countable spacetime events designated as E1, E2, E3, … and that any two are mutually exclusive if and only if they cannot both exist simultaneously. This does not make any sense for spacetime substantiation if the initial assumption is for all points to be indestructible. As spacetime points, they exist forever. There the meaning of existence is that of a process. If this process is gravity then the point with less mass moves toward the one with larger mass. If the masses are equal then they repel giving substance to the whole of spacetime. However, if this process is an orthogonal infinitesimal force and each point can be associated with only one such force then at the infinitesimal region only two such forces can be equal and opposite. Taking as a whole, spacetime is then infinitesimally divisible into an infinite order Hadamard matrix as positive and negative vacuum fields. The only implication is that matrices of the forms [math]\left(\begin{array}{cc}+1&+1\\+1&+1\end{array}\rig ht)[/math] and [math]\left(\begin{array}{cc}-1&-1\\-1&-1\end{array}\right)[/math] could not possibly exist but can only be represented by the null matrix [math]\left(\begin{array}{cc}0&0\\0&0\end{array}\right)[/math]. Nonetheless, the null matrix is more suitable for representing the operation of adding two Hadamard matrices of the same number of degree of freedom and dimension.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

