Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Tools > Mathematics
Reload this Page buy 2 get 1 free
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
buy 2 get 1 free
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
buy 2 get 1 free - 04-13-2006, 12:02 PM

A holomorphic function of another holomorphic function gives yet again a holomorphic function. This is a property of 2-dimensional surface needed for creating a complex loop-manifold. Moreover, a necessary and sufficient condition for all functions having continuous partial derivatives is given by the Cauchy-Riemann partial differential equations (see http://cellular.ci.ulsa.mx/comun/complex/node16.html and http://ndp.jct.ac.il/tutorials/complex/node19.html and http://www.rit.edu/~pnveme/pigf/Complex/complex_afun_3.html and http://www.astro.cf.ac.uk/undergrad/module/PX3211/com/node3.html and http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Cauchy-RiemannEquations.html and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy-Riemann_equations).

Suppose a scalar function F is holomorphic in the complex plane. This is in terms of the real and imaginary part of F and the complex number z = x + iy. Its conjugate is z* = x - iy and the product z*z = x² + y². If x² + y² = 1 then a single loop is formed which defined a unit volume or unit cube if and only if the inscribed sphere is of radius ½ with volume p/6 and the circumscribed sphere is of radius Ö3/2 with volume pÖ3/2.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,477
Thanks Given: 369
Thanked 791x in 727 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 98
   
Smile 04-13-2006, 06:13 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
A holomorphic function of another holomorphic function gives yet again a holomorphic function. This is a property of 2-dimensional surface needed for creating a complex loop-manifold. Moreover, a necessary and sufficient condition for all functions having continuous partial derivatives is given by the Cauchy-Riemann partial differential equations (see http://cellular.ci.ulsa.mx/comun/complex/node16.html and http://ndp.jct.ac.il/tutorials/complex/node19.html and http://www.rit.edu/~pnveme/pigf/Complex/complex_afun_3.html and http://www.astro.cf.ac.uk/undergrad/module/PX3211/com/node3.html and http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Cauchy-RiemannEquations.html and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy-Riemann_equations).

Suppose a scalar function F is holomorphic in the complex plane. This is in terms of the real and imaginary part of F and the complex number z = x + iy. Its conjugate is z* = x - iy and the product z*z = x² + y². If x² + y² = 1 then a single loop is formed which defined a unit volume or unit cube if and only if the inscribed sphere is of radius ½ with volume p/6 and the circumscribed sphere is of radius Ö3/2 with volume pÖ3/2.
I like the title to the thread Antonio,mine is ,die now,and live later?It looks like these
numbers are about to add up!

kind regards michael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
04-14-2006, 12:18 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
die now,and live later?
I always like the idea of enjoy now, pay later or laugh now, cry later. These processes imply periodicity not reversibility.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Determinism or Free Will? Guille Metaphysics 66 04-28-2008 10:59 PM
Loooking for philosophers Gil General Philosophy 80 04-10-2008 02:36 AM
Free will (and the probability of the universe) TinyTree Quantum Physics 2 02-02-2006 11:57 AM
2006-01-07: Free Will Robert Chat Sessions 42 01-11-2006 01:29 AM
Time, Free Will, and Unshared Presents W. M. Consciousness 6 09-03-2005 07:30 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com