two phases of unreality

AntonioLao · **two phases of unreality -** 04-20-2006, 01:31 PM

If there are two universes then there should two phases, one for each universe. However, we are trapped in only just one universe and furthermore we can’t detect the other no matter how hard we tried by quantum mechanics, or even the more advanced quantum field theories, and general relativity. A true theory of everything would be more of a theory of nothing. Nothingness is the complete fusion of these two phases where all activities stopped. No more living, eating, talking, thinking, writing, building, inventing, walking, questioning, etc. This becomes the pure absolute state of the mind as a totally peaceful consciousness of absolute knowledge. Everything in this universe is moving toward the other phase and everything in the other phase is moving toward this phase just like two waves on a collision course toward each other destinies. Reality is only one phase but unreality is two phases. If $\theta$ designates the phase then $\theta_{\alpha}$ and $\theta_{\beta}$ are the two phases. If they are equal then the product of their wavefunctions is zero $e^{i\theta_{\alpha}} e^{-i\theta_{\beta}}=0$ iff their wavefunctions are also identically zero that is $\psi(\alpha)=0$ and $\psi(\beta)=0$ .

AntonioLao · **quantum tunneling -** 04-20-2006, 01:58 PM

The existence of these two phases of unreality gives a compelling argument why quantum tunneling is possible. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_tunneling and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wavefunction.

mkirkpatrick · **keep focussed. -** 04-20-2006, 06:04 PM

Antonio,is that really so?Are we absolutely sure that there is no access to this other universe?This reminds me of an individual who reaches the exalted
state of Samadhi,where one-pointedness focussing intentionality,leads to a
singularity being opened,this in effect Antonio,is the connecting point of two
universes linked together via the singularity,there is an exchange a wave
down meets a wave up,and at that point there is a monumental flash,as one
would get from the fusion process being activated.this state is achieved by
total acceptance,one-pointedness,fixed and prolonged focussed intentionality
which leads to all resistance falling to zero,absolute zero resistentlessness?
this would lead to no-thing becoming the all-thing!We do not need quantum
mechanics for this to occur,all we need Antonio is one pointed focussed
intentionality.

kind regards michael.

HappytheStripper · 04-20-2006, 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AntonioLao

If there are two universes then there should two phases, one for each universe. However, we are trapped in only just one universe and furthermore we can’t detect the other no matter how hard we tried by quantum mechanics

I have worked on a theory for this ... it was in one of my assignments ... and I related everything in the universe to the "U" ..

People have the same problem - trying to locate the deepest meaning within .. requires great definition of the self ... much the same as the universe ... and even today with the greatest technological advances ... one can still not see ones emotions physically ... we can only think thm ... and be conscious of them ... in turn becoming more aware ... maybe we missing the e-motive of the universe???

Quote:

Originally Posted by AntonioLao

A true theory of everything would be more of a theory of nothing. Nothingness is the complete fusion of these two phases where all activities stopped.

I always said the theory of everything was really nothing ... the post is somewhere in this forum ... everything is nothing with something in between... whats in between is what we all try to figure into an equation ...
the equation needs to be one of balance and complete order ...

Quote:

Originally Posted by AntonioLao

No more living, eating, talking, thinking, writing, building, inventing, walking, questioning, etc. This becomes the pure absolute state of the mind as a totally peaceful consciousness of absolute knowledge. Everything in this universe is moving toward the other phase and everything in the other phase is moving toward this phase just like two waves on a collision course toward each other destinies. Reality is only one phase but unreality is two phases. If

designates the phase then

and

are the two phases. If they are equal then the product of their wavefunctions is zero

iff their wavefunctions are also identically zero that is

and

.

Reduction to base level (thanks michael)??? Zero - a cirle with a "I" in the middle ...???

WithoutMe · 04-21-2006, 08:34 AM

Well AntonioLao,
Judging from yur name & also from yur thread starter, it seems to me that u r verily influenced by Taoist Philosophy... Wel, regarding that -- juz give it a thought that: Can't it be that u r the other phase trying to grasp/interact this phase? I mean that the person who is aware of this universe is someone/something that is definetely not of this universe, -- can that be?

Regarding the two phases, the Observer is one of the phase, whereas the Observed is the other phase... is it so?

Guille · 04-21-2006, 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AntonioLao

If a=b then isn't this a form of expressing the sum of euler's identity with the double identity you discovered?

AntonioLao · **replies forthcoming -** 04-21-2006, 02:17 PM

will be back to reply some of the responses.

AntonioLao · 04-24-2006, 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick

Are we absolutely sure that there is no access to this other universe?

Access in the sense of being permanently connected is impossible. In the quantum infinitesimal level of existence, space-time points are constantly being connected and disconnected. When they are connected, distances can be defined and in this sense, there is a direct access between them such as exchanges of mass and energy.

AntonioLao · **go both ways -** 04-24-2006, 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WithoutMe

I mean that the person who is aware of this universe is someone/something that is definetely not of this universe, -- can that be?

In a one to one functional correspondence, there is one observer and one observee. However, in many to many dysfunctional correspondence, both attributes of being observer and observee exist simultaneously.

AntonioLao · **unity -** 04-24-2006, 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GUILLE

If a=b then isn't this a form of expressing the sum of euler's identity with the double identity you discovered?

For Euler's identities the product is unity not zero.