| |
 | |
 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 7,749
| |
02-27-2007, 07:07 PM
|  Re: imaginary measures
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao  But if our separate wills are tied together similar to tying our legs then the speed to reach the truth is slowed down considerably. |
That is an excellent observation Antonio,untie me at once?
regards michael.
__________________
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
02-28-2007, 04:25 PM
| | Re: imaginary measures
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick untie me at once | But the bonds are made of superstrings. These are impossible to untie. To do so we must reach the eleventh dimension first and foremost.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 7,749
| |
02-28-2007, 09:39 PM
| Re: imaginary measures
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao But the bonds are made of superstrings. These are impossible to untie. To do so we must reach the eleventh dimension first and foremost. |
No problem,I know of a shortcut through the black-light?
regards michael.
__________________
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | | | | 8th degree Black Belt
Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 1,399
29  | |
03-01-2007, 08:36 AM
| | Re: imaginary measures
Can an imaginary vacuum create an actual boson?? Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao Quantum field theories assert that the absolute vacuum is massless. However, the false vacuum is massive as it is dominated by the scalar Higgs field. And the masses of all other elementary particles were manifested by spontaneous symmetry breaking of this relatively false vacuum through a Higgs mechanism (a way of creating mass out of the vacuum). This correctness of this concept is pending its verification by the discovery of the Higgs boson. | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
03-01-2007, 02:52 PM
| | Re: imaginary measures
Quote: |
Originally Posted by dipayankar an imaginary vacuum | All vacuums are real even though some are interactive, some are permissive, some are aggressive, some are repulsive, some are attractive, some are submissive, and many more other descriptive personalities.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | 8th degree Black Belt
Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 1,399
29 | |
03-02-2007, 01:50 AM
| | Re: imaginary measures
What good is a non interactive vacuum??? If it does not interact then we do not even know the properties of such a vacuum... Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao All vacuums are real even though some are interactive, some are permissive, some are aggressive, some are repulsive, some are attractive, some are submissive, and many more other descriptive personalities. | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
03-02-2007, 05:02 PM
| | Re: imaginary measures
Quote: |
Originally Posted by dipayankar What good is a non interactive vacuum??? | What bad is a non interactive vacuum if it support the universe?
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | 8th degree Black Belt
Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 1,399
29 | |
03-05-2007, 04:48 AM
| | Re: imaginary measures
How would it support the Universe?? Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao What bad is a non interactive vacuum if it support the universe? | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
03-05-2007, 01:37 PM
| | Re: imaginary measures
Quote: |
Originally Posted by dipayankar How would it support the Universe?? | By the normal components of every quantum fields.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | 8th degree Black Belt
Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 1,399
29 | |
03-08-2007, 12:45 PM
| | Re: imaginary measures
A non interacting vacuum would not posess any quantum field. Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao By the normal components of every quantum fields. | | | | | | |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | |
Similar Threads | | Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | | does imaginary exist | Mohan.C | Branches of Mathematics | 25 | 04-10-2006 01:40 PM | | 1st entry log | AdamF | Illusions | 4 | 12-02-2005 02:19 PM |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:39 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
VBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys.
| |
