will math or will not?

[AntonioLao]

Mathematical freedom exists. That is math choice is free. In other words, all math choices are free choices as mathematical degrees of freedom. There is no such thing as forced math choices. Even though sometimes the thought arises that one is being forced to make a number or pattern choice? In a democratic society, it is called advertisements. In a coercive government, it is known as propaganda. Both objectives is the transmission of information for positive reaction (regardless whether its content is true or false using numbers, words, speeches, sound, musical rhythms, or geometric patterns of light and color). All these requires further investigations for all interested parties and repeated productive and successful utilities result into conventional norm and standardization as fashions, fads, or trends which in time become generally acceptable. Too little or too much information could form indecisions and the eagerness toward expected actions becoming unwanted inactions, thus reaching a state of no choice with its inherent catastrophic consequence at a point of desperation to act accordingly.

At a universal scale, the entire cosmos could have started out as a state of null choice known in cosmological parlance as the big bang singularity. So, is that really what happened? A pent-up powerful force of lasting cosmic indecisions exploded into radiation, energy, matter, stars, and galaxies? This could also be interpreted that at the beginning of time, an angry mathematician was forced to create the Universe out of having no math choice. However, he could have also made the creation out of an axiom of choice, that every space-time soul is given the free will to choose each own life’s path integral or summation (good or bad, positive or negative). With one condition that once a particular path is chosen, it will take the recreation of the whole cosmic tapestry to change it. Once a pattern of a fabric is crocheted it’s fixed. In mathematics, this is the underlying principle of a directional invariance with eight fundamental properties. Nonetheless, there are three options: (1) destroy the pattern, (2) start a new design, or (3) live with it. Obviously, the angry mathematician chose the 3rd option otherwise nobody will be here to talk about it.

[Guille]

Baudrillard, a cultural critique which I have mentioned and quoted in several posts, critizises the sociologists for telling us that opinions and subjects are controlled by the advertisement, and that these are actually just like propaganda. He says that the logic is like this; the hyperreality to which we have gone, by the conjunction of the real and the imaginary, has taken us to a world where the image, the seduction, the simulation, the sings... Are all dissipated, and when they are controlled, like in advertisement, then the subjects dissapear and the opinions too. It isn't that we are not free due to the control of our actions, it is that our actions is all that there is of us, to the extend that they are objective, it is not longer 'guille posting that' but 'x posting that' and x can be anyone. We have ceased to exist without death.

[AntonioLao]

it is not longer 'guille posting that' but 'x posting that' and x can be anyone. We have ceased to exist without death.

Your postings made you as a unique poster and in relation to this scientific forum, you're the top poster. This is an achievement to which nobody in the entire visible universe can take away. It is now a fact and will be a fact forever and ever until the destruction of the entire cosmos in order to erase the pattern carved in stone.

[Guille]

Your postings made you as a unique poster and in relation to this scientific forum, you're the top poster. This is an achievement to which nobody in the entire visible universe can take away. It is now a fact and will be a fact forever and ever until the destruction of the entire cosmos in order to erase the pattern carved in stone.

But my posts are virtual. These words are virtual just as their meaning. This website and forums are virtual. The whole of my existence for you, or for any other member, is completelly virtual. If it is a fact that I have posted that, then how is it that if robert eliminates the post, and everyone who ever know anything about or related to the post dies, including you and me, then, how can you say it will be a fact till the end of times? Not even facts themselves are facts, how would a fiction (like my virtual post) ever be a fact. Anyway, Baudrillard doesn't deny that it is a fact hat I have posted, but he says that it is no longer the subject Guille posting, but the idea of Guille, the representation of all of you of Guille, the public figure of Guille, the shared thoughts of Guille, the influenced and (rarelly) influential Guille... Not Guille himself. And so, you just have to copy my public figure, my shared thoughts, my influence, my representation... And the act will be done. There is no absolute truth, it is all relative, subjective and nihilist. Nothing tells us that we exist further to observations (science), interpretations (philosophy) and expressions (art), for that used to be metaphysics, and metaphysics is dead.

[AntonioLao]

how can you say it will be a fact till the end of times?

In the dynamic fabric of space-time there are copies of your postings being made and spread over the entire tapestry like a cosmic holographic image.

[Guille]

In the dynamic fabric of space-time there are copies of your postings being made and spread over the entire tapestry like a cosmic holographic image.

But that would impply that all the space-time points exists in every single space-time point, what is thrice; physically, mathematically, and philosophically impossible, absurd and paradoxical.

[mkirkpatrick]

In the dynamic fabric of space-time there are copies of your postings being made and spread over the entire tapestry like a cosmic holographic image.

Absolutely right there Antonio,all is recorded in the
astral light,Akashic record!

kind regards michael

[AntonioLao]

But that would impply that all the space-time points exists in every single space-time point

Any photon contains all the information of the entire universe from beginning to end.

[Guille]

Any photon contains all the information of the entire universe from beginning to end.

Is this proven? I mean, if I could stop completelly a photon (and this has been done, I read it in Wikipedia) then if I was able to build a sufficiently capable computer, and put that photon's information into the computer (I guess the appropiate technology would be the photoelectric effect?), the computer would give us all the information of the universe of all times, and thus all science problems will be solved (not the philosophical, though)?

[AntonioLao]

the computer would give us all the information of the universe of all times, and thus all science problems will be solved

Theoretically speaking, that is possible but experimentally due to quantum mechanical effect of locality and nonlocality and the uncertainty principle, the act of seeing disturbs the object being seen such that the position and momentum are changed during the process.