Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Tools > Mathematics
Reload this Page will math or will not?
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
will math or will not?
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
will math or will not? - 05-04-2006, 12:41 PM

Mathematical freedom exists. That is math choice is free. In other words, all math choices are free choices as mathematical degrees of freedom. There is no such thing as forced math choices. Even though sometimes the thought arises that one is being forced to make a number or pattern choice? In a democratic society, it is called advertisements. In a coercive government, it is known as propaganda. Both objectives is the transmission of information for positive reaction (regardless whether its content is true or false using numbers, words, speeches, sound, musical rhythms, or geometric patterns of light and color). All these requires further investigations for all interested parties and repeated productive and successful utilities result into conventional norm and standardization as fashions, fads, or trends which in time become generally acceptable. Too little or too much information could form indecisions and the eagerness toward expected actions becoming unwanted inactions, thus reaching a state of no choice with its inherent catastrophic consequence at a point of desperation to act accordingly.

At a universal scale, the entire cosmos could have started out as a state of null choice known in cosmological parlance as the big bang singularity. So, is that really what happened? A pent-up powerful force of lasting cosmic indecisions exploded into radiation, energy, matter, stars, and galaxies? This could also be interpreted that at the beginning of time, an angry mathematician was forced to create the Universe out of having no math choice. However, he could have also made the creation out of an axiom of choice, that every space-time soul is given the free will to choose each own life’s path integral or summation (good or bad, positive or negative). With one condition that once a particular path is chosen, it will take the recreation of the whole cosmic tapestry to change it. Once a pattern of a fabric is crocheted it’s fixed. In mathematics, this is the underlying principle of a directional invariance with eight fundamental properties. Nonetheless, there are three options: (1) destroy the pattern, (2) start a new design, or (3) live with it. Obviously, the angry mathematician chose the 3rd option otherwise nobody will be here to talk about it.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 48
   
05-04-2006, 12:59 PM

Baudrillard, a cultural critique which I have mentioned and quoted in several posts, critizises the sociologists for telling us that opinions and subjects are controlled by the advertisement, and that these are actually just like propaganda. He says that the logic is like this; the hyperreality to which we have gone, by the conjunction of the real and the imaginary, has taken us to a world where the image, the seduction, the simulation, the sings... Are all dissipated, and when they are controlled, like in advertisement, then the subjects dissapear and the opinions too. It isn't that we are not free due to the control of our actions, it is that our actions is all that there is of us, to the extend that they are objective, it is not longer 'guille posting that' but 'x posting that' and x can be anyone. We have ceased to exist without death.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
it is your postings forever and ever
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
it is your postings forever and ever - 05-04-2006, 01:13 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
it is not longer 'guille posting that' but 'x posting that' and x can be anyone. We have ceased to exist without death.
Your postings made you as a unique poster and in relation to this scientific forum, you're the top poster. This is an achievement to which nobody in the entire visible universe can take away. It is now a fact and will be a fact forever and ever until the destruction of the entire cosmos in order to erase the pattern carved in stone.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 48
   
05-04-2006, 01:56 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Your postings made you as a unique poster and in relation to this scientific forum, you're the top poster. This is an achievement to which nobody in the entire visible universe can take away. It is now a fact and will be a fact forever and ever until the destruction of the entire cosmos in order to erase the pattern carved in stone.
But my posts are virtual. These words are virtual just as their meaning. This website and forums are virtual. The whole of my existence for you, or for any other member, is completelly virtual. If it is a fact that I have posted that, then how is it that if robert eliminates the post, and everyone who ever know anything about or related to the post dies, including you and me, then, how can you say it will be a fact till the end of times? Not even facts themselves are facts, how would a fiction (like my virtual post) ever be a fact. Anyway, Baudrillard doesn't deny that it is a fact hat I have posted, but he says that it is no longer the subject Guille posting, but the idea of Guille, the representation of all of you of Guille, the public figure of Guille, the shared thoughts of Guille, the influenced and (rarelly) influential Guille... Not Guille himself. And so, you just have to copy my public figure, my shared thoughts, my influence, my representation... And the act will be done. There is no absolute truth, it is all relative, subjective and nihilist. Nothing tells us that we exist further to observations (science), interpretations (philosophy) and expressions (art), for that used to be metaphysics, and metaphysics is dead.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
copies are being made
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
copies are being made - 05-04-2006, 02:03 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
how can you say it will be a fact till the end of times?
In the dynamic fabric of space-time there are copies of your postings being made and spread over the entire tapestry like a cosmic holographic image.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 48
   
05-04-2006, 02:41 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
In the dynamic fabric of space-time there are copies of your postings being made and spread over the entire tapestry like a cosmic holographic image.
But that would impply that all the space-time points exists in every single space-time point, what is thrice; physically, mathematically, and philosophically impossible, absurd and paradoxical.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,477
Thanks Given: 369
Thanked 791x in 727 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 98
   
Smile 05-04-2006, 06:37 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
In the dynamic fabric of space-time there are copies of your postings being made and spread over the entire tapestry like a cosmic holographic image.
Absolutely right there Antonio,all is recorded in the
astral light,Akashic record!

kind regards michael


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
information content of a photon
Old
  (#8 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
information content of a photon - 05-05-2006, 12:32 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
But that would impply that all the space-time points exists in every single space-time point
Any photon contains all the information of the entire universe from beginning to end.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 48
   
05-05-2006, 12:36 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Any photon contains all the information of the entire universe from beginning to end.
Is this proven? I mean, if I could stop completelly a photon (and this has been done, I read it in Wikipedia) then if I was able to build a sufficiently capable computer, and put that photon's information into the computer (I guess the appropiate technology would be the photoelectric effect?), the computer would give us all the information of the universe of all times, and thus all science problems will be solved (not the philosophical, though)?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
correct assumption
Old
  (#10 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
correct assumption - 05-05-2006, 12:51 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
the computer would give us all the information of the universe of all times, and thus all science problems will be solved
Theoretically speaking, that is possible but experimentally due to quantum mechanical effect of locality and nonlocality and the uncertainty principle, the act of seeing disturbs the object being seen such that the position and momentum are changed during the process.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
who is who in math? AntonioLao Philosophy of Math 46 05-01-2008 07:25 PM
God Guille Intelligent Design 192 12-01-2007 01:57 PM
Who is to deal with phillosophy of math? hanzoganz Philosophy of Math 4 05-08-2006 09:15 PM
single math misunderstanding AntonioLao