| |
 | |
 | |
Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
05-04-2006, 02:49 PM
| | probabilists, statisticians, mathematicians
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 7,749
| |
05-04-2006, 07:46 PM
|
Quote: |
Originally Posted by AntonioLao | I have a problem Antonio,who do I go to?I need a acceptable formula for the toe post
where will I find it!Would it help if i looked under the bed?
kind regards michael.
__________________
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
05-05-2006, 01:37 PM
| | innermost recesses
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick where will I find it! | In the innermost recesses of the mind. I'm doing the same search into the mind's of absolute vacuum.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | The Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 3,278
48  | |
05-05-2006, 01:38 PM
| | Antonio,
I find the five most interesting and amusing mathematicians to be: Gauss, Ramanujan, Nash, Euler and Leibnitz (I support him in the invention of the calculus, not Newton). What are your five? | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
05-05-2006, 01:55 PM
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by GUILLE What are your five? | I'm still trying to understand any of them. They all contributed to my sincere confusion at this point in time. Trying to use math for the successful implementations of cold or hot fusion.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | The Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 3,278
48 | |
05-05-2006, 02:06 PM
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by AntonioLao I'm still trying to understand any of them. They all contributed to my sincere confusion at this point in time. Trying to use math for the successful implementations of cold or hot fusion. | Then better invent a time machine, kill them all, from Euclid and Pythagoras to Godel and Wiles, and then come back and you won't ahve to worry about mathematics in your developments about cold and hot fusion. There is a little price though; no economy, no strict science, no technology, no music (the greeks considered it a math)... So even though you could develop the theory for cold or hot fusion, there would be no money, no technology and no background data for it's creation and production. | | | | Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 7,749
| |
05-05-2006, 02:11 PM
|
Quote: |
Originally Posted by AntonioLao In the innermost recesses of the mind. I'm doing the same search into the mind's of absolute vacuum. | I feel Antonio,that
an absolute vacuum can only exist in the void,which to me is always on the other side of the creational first wave,and therefore always out of reach!
What are your thoughts on this?
kind regards michael.
__________________
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
05-05-2006, 02:13 PM
| | fusion was killed
Quote: |
Originally Posted by GUILLE Then better invent a time machine, kill them all | I could try to go back in time and kill the killer who killed the fusion scientist who was the only person who knows about cold and hot fusion.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | The Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 3,278
48 | |
05-05-2006, 02:15 PM
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by AntonioLao I could try to go back in time and kill the killer who killed the fusion scientist who was the only person who knows about cold and hot fusion. | Who was that scientist? And by the way, what if the person who went back in time to kill the fusion inventor was himself from the future because in the world were his invention was done everything was chaotic, and lost sense, in the most analogous moment to the apocalipsis? | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
05-05-2006, 02:16 PM
| | successful fusion
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick What are your thoughts on this? | Successful fusion means we have breached the absolute vacuum and happily tapping its energy source.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | | |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:38 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
VBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys.
| |
