Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    probabilists, statisticians, mathematicians

    a list of probabilists can be found in the link below
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probabilist for a list of statisticians see the link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_statisticians and a list of mathematicians see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mathematicians.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    a list of probabilists can be found in the link below
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probabilist for a list of statisticians see the link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_statisticians and a list of mathematicians see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mathematicians.
    I have a problem Antonio,who do I go to?I need a acceptable formula for the toe post
    where will I find it!Would it help if i looked under the bed?


    kind regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    innermost recesses

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    where will I find it!
    In the innermost recesses of the mind. I'm doing the same search into the mind's of absolute vacuum.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Antonio,

    I find the five most interesting and amusing mathematicians to be: Gauss, Ramanujan, Nash, Euler and Leibnitz (I support him in the invention of the calculus, not Newton). What are your five?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    What are your five?
    I'm still trying to understand any of them. They all contributed to my sincere confusion at this point in time. Trying to use math for the successful implementations of cold or hot fusion.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #6
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    I'm still trying to understand any of them. They all contributed to my sincere confusion at this point in time. Trying to use math for the successful implementations of cold or hot fusion.
    Then better invent a time machine, kill them all, from Euclid and Pythagoras to Godel and Wiles, and then come back and you won't ahve to worry about mathematics in your developments about cold and hot fusion. There is a little price though; no economy, no strict science, no technology, no music (the greeks considered it a math)... So even though you could develop the theory for cold or hot fusion, there would be no money, no technology and no background data for it's creation and production.

  7. #7
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    In the innermost recesses of the mind. I'm doing the same search into the mind's of absolute vacuum.
    I feel Antonio,that
    an absolute vacuum can only exist in the void,which to me is always on the other side of the creational first wave,and therefore always out of reach!
    What are your thoughts on this?


    kind regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  8. #8
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    fusion was killed

    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    Then better invent a time machine, kill them all
    I could try to go back in time and kill the killer who killed the fusion scientist who was the only person who knows about cold and hot fusion.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  9. #9
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    I could try to go back in time and kill the killer who killed the fusion scientist who was the only person who knows about cold and hot fusion.
    Who was that scientist? And by the way, what if the person who went back in time to kill the fusion inventor was himself from the future because in the world were his invention was done everything was chaotic, and lost sense, in the most analogous moment to the apocalipsis?

  10. #10
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    successful fusion

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    What are your thoughts on this?
    Successful fusion means we have breached the absolute vacuum and happily tapping its energy source.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top