Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Tools > Mathematics
Reload this Page unit circle
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
unit circle
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,318
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
unit circle - 05-17-2006, 01:09 PM

The important of the unit circle in mathematics could never be over emphasized as shown in the link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_circle


Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,318
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
01-03-2007, 03:25 PM

In the first half of the 19th century, Cauchy presented an important fundamental theorem of complex analysis. This theorem states that the line integral of an analytic function around a simple closed curve is zero. His contemporary, Liouville, also presented a theorem stating that a bounded and entirely analytic complex function must be constant. Two questions could be asked. First, is zero a complex number or a real number? Second, is Liouville’s constant complex or real?

Before answering and before asking a 3rd question, it is worthwhile to note some of the important applications of these theorems for formulating physical theories. In vector analysis (as extension of complex analysis), their appearances can be found within Stoke’s theorem and Gauss’s theorem (divergence theorem). The former relates line integral to surface integral. The latter relates surface integral to volume integral. Both were crucial for the success of Maxwell’s electromagnetism.

The 3rd question is whether closed curves and closed surfaces have meaningful representations in the real number domain?

Note that closed curves in general relativity are the same as closed worldlines. Closed volumes in quantum mechanics are the same as zero-point energies. In electromagnetism, closed magnetic lines do not exist. Constant volumes only imply constant internal electric charge densities and invariant magnitudes of magnetic moments.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

Last edited by dleviwing : 06-03-2007 at 05:27 PM.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why a God? bobbyd2 Intelligent Design 44 01-10-2007 02:02 PM
complex circle AntonioLao Mathematics 9 12-11-2006 04:39 PM
Our 3 Dimensional Prison Tesla Intelligent Design 4 08-22-2006 09:09 PM
What is the difference between unit: h and unit : ħ =h/ 2pi? socratus Quantum Physics 0 07-20-2006 10:13 AM
great circle, shed light on infinity subversion General Philosophy 7 08-22-2005 10:31 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com