Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: unit circle

  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    unit circle

    The important of the unit circle in mathematics could never be over emphasized as shown in the link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_circle
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  2. #2
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    In the first half of the 19th century, Cauchy presented an important fundamental theorem of complex analysis. This theorem states that the line integral of an analytic function around a simple closed curve is zero. His contemporary, Liouville, also presented a theorem stating that a bounded and entirely analytic complex function must be constant. Two questions could be asked. First, is zero a complex number or a real number? Second, is Liouville’s constant complex or real?

    Before answering and before asking a 3rd question, it is worthwhile to note some of the important applications of these theorems for formulating physical theories. In vector analysis (as extension of complex analysis), their appearances can be found within Stoke’s theorem and Gauss’s theorem (divergence theorem). The former relates line integral to surface integral. The latter relates surface integral to volume integral. Both were crucial for the success of Maxwell’s electromagnetism.

    The 3rd question is whether closed curves and closed surfaces have meaningful representations in the real number domain?

    Note that closed curves in general relativity are the same as closed worldlines. Closed volumes in quantum mechanics are the same as zero-point energies. In electromagnetism, closed magnetic lines do not exist. Constant volumes only imply constant internal electric charge densities and invariant magnitudes of magnetic moments.
    Last edited by dleviwing; 06-03-2007 at 05:27 PM.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Why a God?
    By bobbyd2 in forum Intelligent Design
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 01-10-2007, 02:02 PM
  2. complex circle
    By AntonioLao in forum Mathematics
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-11-2006, 04:39 PM
  3. Our 3 Dimensional Prison
    By Tesla in forum Intelligent Design
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-22-2006, 09:09 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-20-2006, 10:13 AM
  5. great circle, shed light on infinity
    By subversion in forum General Philosophy
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-22-2005, 10:31 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top