Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    eccentric probability

    For 3 of the 4 conics, the eccentricity is less than or equal to unity. In the theory of probability, unity represents absolute certainty while less than unity represents certain probability and zero represents impossibility.

    Therefore, the parabolas represent certainty of classical Newtonian mechanics. Ellipses represent uncertainty of quantum mechanics. Circles represent the impossibility of detecting the true vacuum even though its existence is a theoretical certainty.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63

    Re: eccentric probability

    Continuing the analysis, what to hyperbolas represent?

    Also, what is the probability of the eccentricities? What I mean by this question is that if, for example, it is more probable (there are more possibilities) to get a parabola or an elipsis than a perfect circle?

  3. #3
    7th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    India
    Posts
    1,000
    Blog Entries
    25
    Thanks Given
    111
    Thanked 48x in 38 Posts
    Rep Power
    39

    Re: eccentric probability

    Antonio,
    But Ellipses have a probability to be a circle. As I have studied it is said Circle is a special case of an Ellipse. But then if one of the probability of an Ellipse is to be a circle then how can the circle be impossible.


  4. #4
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: eccentric probability

    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    Continuing the analysis, what to hyperbolas represent?
    I don't know. According to probability theory, no probability is greater than unity. Maybe, it's related to the probable existence of hyperspacetime, for example, from general relativity.
    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    what is the probability of the eccentricities?
    I have no idea.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mohan.C
    But Ellipses have a probability to be a circle.
    That's not my argument.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  5. #5
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63

    Re: eccentric probability

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    I don't know. According to probability theory, no probability is greater than unity. Maybe, it's related to the probable existence of hyperspacetime, for example, from general relativity.
    In your starter you say 'in 3 of the 4 conics the eccentricity is equal or less than 1'. So, do you think that there is a necessary incoerence between geometry and probability, or that they can live together (I still think their union, as I said months ago, shoul dbe the main task of mathematicians and mathematical physicists).

  6. #6
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: eccentric probability

    Quote Originally Posted by Guille
    that there is a necessary incoerence between geometry and probability
    Geometry deals with static deterministic variables (points, lines, curves, and surfaces in topology). On the other hand, probability deals with dynamic random variables.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Details of the probability of the universe
    By TinyTree in forum Your TOE Theory
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-01-2005, 11:41 AM
  2. Probability of the universe
    By TinyTree in forum Your TOE Theory
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 10-21-2005, 10:17 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top