LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksPrime numbers between 1 and 20 are 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, and 19. If the unit is represented by □ then 2 is □□ and 3 is □□□ and 5 is □□□□□ and 7 is □□□□□□□ and 11 is □□□□□□□□□□□ and 13 is □□□□□□□□□□□□□ and 17 is □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ and 19 is □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□. All these indicate geometric lines and simply imply that geometric primes could not be used to represent geometric areas although these could only be represented by composite numbers starting with the perfect square 2 × 2 = 4 or 2 × 3 = 6 or 3 × 2 = 6 and furthermore the simplest geometric volume by 2 × 2 × 2 = 8.
Attachment 255
Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 8 of 8
Thread: geometric primes
- 06-10-2006, 02:34 PM #1Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
geometric primes
Last edited by AntonioLao; 01-14-2008 at 03:27 PM.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 06-10-2006, 03:16 PM #26th degree Black Belt
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 844
- Blog Entries
- 3
- Thanks Given
- 0
- Thanked 2x in 2 Posts
- Rep Power
- 32
Re: geometric primes Antonio, what are the implications for the 5 Platonic solids (Cube, Octahedron, Tetrahedron, Icosahedron, and Dodecahedron) which seem to be based on pyramid structures?
The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears
- 06-11-2006, 03:48 PM #3Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: geometric primes
Could they be related to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonardo_da_Vinci discoveries?
Originally Posted by harmonygirl Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 06-11-2006, 05:00 PM #46th degree Black Belt
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 844
- Blog Entries
- 3
- Thanks Given
- 0
- Thanked 2x in 2 Posts
- Rep Power
- 32
Re: geometric primes I don't know a lot about his work in this area. The site only gave a single example of geometric work and it seemed to be related more to the 'golden ratio'. I guess my query was more to the effect that when creating symbols for prime numbers, perhaps a more appropriate icon might be a pyramid? I am trying to put geometry in context of TOE, and this way makes sense to me. Tell me what you think.
The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears
- 06-18-2006, 02:31 PM #5Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: geometric primes
I am still trying to understand the significance of the vertex of the pyramid. It seems to signify an origin of something, say from zero dimension to one dimension then to two and three dimension. Originally Posted by harmonygirl Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 06-19-2006, 12:40 AM #66th degree Black Belt
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 844
- Blog Entries
- 3
- Thanks Given
- 0
- Thanked 2x in 2 Posts
- Rep Power
- 32
Re: geometric primes I like that interpretation Antonio, I think you're on to something!
The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears
- 06-19-2006, 03:05 AM #7The Thinker
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- Spain
- Posts
- 3,278
- Blog Entries
- 7
- Thanks Given
- 0
- Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
- Rep Power
- 63
Re: geometric primes
Is there a physical manifestation in relation or analogy to these mathematical objects? Originally Posted by AntonioLao
- 06-25-2006, 02:58 PM #8Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: geometric primes
Related to physical dimensionality, I supposed. Originally Posted by Guille Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Reply With QuoteThread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Time
By DHiMac in forum Time TravelReplies: 430Last Post: 03-25-2009, 10:59 PM -
Geometric shapes
By harmonygirl in forum AlchemyReplies: 12Last Post: 06-29-2007, 05:06 AM -
Only Projective Geometry can encompass spacetime
By infinitymike in forum Your TOE TheoryReplies: 25Last Post: 10-11-2005, 06:09 PM
Posting Permissions
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.11
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:05 AM.
vBulletin 4.0 skin by CompleteVB
