Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: density

  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    density

    Among the concepts of linear density, surface density, and volume density, only volume density makes sense. Nevertheless, in both gravitational and electric potential theory, the Laplacian operator Ѳ operating on the potential functions gives absolute values of density greater than zero. However, when it operates on the magnetic vector or scalar potentials, the results are always zero. There is still no logical explanation for these similarity and distinction among potentials of gravity, electricity, and magnetism.

    Therefore, it can be suggested that magnetism could not describe closed surfaces enclosing a definite volume of space and time. If this is not possible then how could magnetic field energy exist? It seems energy density could only make sense if expressed as energy intensity per unit volume.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: density

    Antonio,this is getting embarrassing,three great thread starters in a row,keep up this outflow of creative ideation.
    You said Antonio,and I quote,"There is still no "logical" explaination for these
    similarity and distinction among potentials of gravity,electricity,and magnetism."Unquote.I think the operative word here Antonio is "logical",what is needed is to consider the illogical,and then you will find the answer!Likethe
    Ying and Yang,there are two sides to expressed reality,one is the logical,and the other is the illogical,you have to "wholeheartedly" embrace both,to fully
    understand the "whole" picture of manifested energy,"shaped" and in-formed
    by focussed intent?



    kind regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: density

    Energy is truly square integrable and not by any other ways. Furthermore, square of energy as manifestation through the mind is only using the first power of itself, E instead of E times E.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The philosophy and Attributes of ETHER
    By dleviwing in forum General Phenomena
    Replies: 88
    Last Post: 05-04-2010, 03:59 PM
  2. A question concerning density, mathematical proof.
    By Dragongod in forum General Physics
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 05-25-2009, 04:32 PM
  3. Is it possible that the geocentric system is right?
    By jimmy brousseau in forum Assume it to be true
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-29-2007, 02:51 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top