Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Tools > Mathematics
Reload this Page magneticity
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
magneticity
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 184x in 178 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
magneticity - 07-22-2006, 04:08 PM

Dirac postulated the existence of magnetic monopoles in 1931. In spite of continued experimental researches, no monopole has been found. It is now believed that these failures are consequences of a lack of understanding of the underlying magnetic as well as electric topology. However, both can be described using the topology of two distinct magnetic helicities. They are used to describe the stability of stellar systems from their births to their death of billions of years. This stability implies that charged particles such as electrons and protons should contain both helicities within their sub-quantum structures.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: magneticity
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,477
Thanks Given: 369
Thanked 792x in 728 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 98
   
Smile Re: magneticity - 02-25-2007, 09:44 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
Dirac postulated the existence of magnetic monopoles in 1931. In spite of continued experimental researches, no monopole has been found. It is now believed that these failures are consequences of a lack of understanding of the underlying magnetic as well as electric topology. However, both can be described using the topology of two distinct magnetic helicities. They are used to describe the stability of stellar systems from their births to their death of billions of years. This stability implies that charged particles such as electrons and protons should contain both helicities within their sub-quantum structures.
Why do you think he postulated the existence of magnetic monopoles,there must have been a suspicion in his mind that something was not quite right,and that there was a
disturbance in the ether unaccounted for.


regards michael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: magneticity
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
2nd degree Black Belt
theunify is on a distinguished road
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 327
Thanks Given: 24
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2006
Rep Power: 10
   
Smile Re: magneticity - 02-26-2007, 09:33 AM

he simply knew that his hypothesis was as right as anyone elses and therefore must be correct, or else everyone else was incorrect, thereby proving monopoles exist simply by proving everybody else was unsure.
My hypothesis perhaps is that positive, matter creating, monopoles exist
and negative, matter consuming, monopoles exist in the imaginary realm of the complex plane(s).
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick View Post
Why do you think he postulated the existence of magnetic monopoles,there must have been a suspicion in his mind that something was not quite right,and that there was a
disturbance in the ether unaccounted for.


regards michael.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: magneticity
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 184x in 178 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
Re: magneticity - 02-26-2007, 02:15 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
Why do you think he postulated the existence of magnetic monopoles
By second guessing Dirac's mentality at the time, maybe he just wanted to imitate the successful formulation of electricity and since electricity and magnetism are inseparable.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com