LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksIt is not a complement to talk about something and to mean something else. However, this happens frequently when talking about the quantum world of fields and elementary objects or waves and particles. The concept was first proposed in 1927 by Bohr in order to make sense all measurements of quantum mechanics. Later in its development, complementarity became one of four vital components of the Copenhagen interpretation. The other three not in any order but equally important are Heisenberg’s uncertainty, probability calculus, and collapse of the wave function for a system disturbed by an inquisitive observer.
Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 10 of 10
Thread: complementarity
- 07-23-2006, 03:46 PM #1Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
complementarity
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 07-23-2006, 06:07 PM #2Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,619
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 295
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: complementarity I agree Antonio,I think the pioneers in the quantum field,opened the door
and Pandoras box,which allowed the genie out,this haspaved the way for the now rapidly growing acceptance of a universal intelligence,and that the
universe is self aware and fully alive!
kind regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 07-24-2006, 07:49 AM #3The Thinker
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- Spain
- Posts
- 3,278
- Blog Entries
- 7
- Thanks Given
- 0
- Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
- Rep Power
- 63
Re: complementarity
Antonio,
I think fields and waves are a misinterpretation of nature. I don't reduce everything to particles, cause those are also nonsensical (how can everything be made of zero dimensional and thus non existing things?). I think the origin of fields and waves is the same in idea. But can you translate this philosophy of my of some scientific concept into a scientific hypothesis? I mean, is there a proof in nature that waves and fields ahve the same origin?
- 07-30-2006, 04:47 PM #4Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: complementarity
The latest theories of the union of waves and particles are the quantum field theories. I'm working on one of these versions.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 07-30-2006, 04:55 PM #5Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,619
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 295
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: complementarity I would be very grateful Antonio,if you share them with us when you finish
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
your study.
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 07-30-2006, 05:00 PM #6Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: complementarity
I could never be finished or 100% sure of my study. As for sharing, I have done just that since the 1st day I logged on TOQUEST. Still need to put everything into a paper or a book. Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 07-30-2006, 05:18 PM #7Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,619
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 295
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: complementarity Forgive me Antonio,you have indeed shared all your findings with us. Originally Posted by AntonioLao
I was not thinking correctly when i wrote this.
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 08-05-2006, 03:48 PM #8Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: complementarity
But I continuously failed to communicate my innermost ideas.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 08-05-2006, 06:24 PM #9Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,619
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 295
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: complementarity Antonio,try and covey those innermost ideas,I would dearly love to Originally Posted by AntonioLao
see them!
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 08-07-2006, 02:15 PM #10Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: complementarity
could these ideas be communicated by mental telepathy?
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Reply With QuoteThread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.11
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:15 AM.
vBulletin 4.0 skin by CompleteVB
