LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksThis is a quantum mechanism description of asexual union or pairing of universally chosen conjugate variables. Presently, there are still three sets of accepted conjugates: pairs consisted of any of positions and any of linear momenta (velocities), pairs consisted of any of time intervals and any of energy differences, and pairs consisted of any of angular momenta and any of orthogonal angular positions.
Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 7 of 7
Thread: conjugality
- 07-23-2006, 03:47 PM #1Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
conjugality
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 07-23-2006, 05:55 PM #2Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,619
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 295
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: conjugality Antonio,what can I say about this thread!First I think there is a need to
deracinate the main thrust,followed by an insightful penetralia,which then should provide the opacity needed to comprehend the ubiquitous of the
situation?
kind regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 07-30-2006, 04:39 PM #3Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: conjugality
I'll still don't understand why there should be conjugate pairs at all?
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 07-30-2006, 05:05 PM #4Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,619
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 295
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: conjugality Maybe they realize something we do not?Or maybe they arejust good friends!
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 08-05-2006, 03:42 PM #5Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: conjugality
It is either time is zero while energy not zero or vice versa. Nevertheless, both time and energy can't be zero.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 08-05-2006, 06:28 PM #6Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,619
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 295
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: conjugality Energy can be zero.time is always zero in the respect that it is an illusion? Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Energy can be manifest and at 1,or unmanifest and set at 0.?
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 08-07-2006, 02:18 PM #7Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: conjugality
The principle of quantum mechanics stated succinctly that the product of time interval and energy difference is a value greater than Planck's constant of action.
Energy, time and further generalizations
General arguments, connected with the theory of relativity, point out that seemingly a relation like the following should exist: But its correct mathematical formulation was given only in 1945 by L. I. Mandelshtam and I. E. Tamm.
This is weird because there is no operator for time in Quantum Mechanics. Time is just a parameter in Quantum Mechanics ...
As such, one cannot have an operator for time and so, this relation has not the same origin as the Heisenberg uncertainty Relation. The relation of time and energy can be obtained by using Time Dependent Schrödinger equation.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Reply With QuoteThread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.11
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:16 AM.
vBulletin 4.0 skin by CompleteVB
