For the universal set U and subsets A, B of U, the following three identities are always true:
1. A – A = O
2. O – A = O
3. A – U = O
Here, O is known as the empty set.
For the universal set U and subsets A, B of U, the following three identities are always true:
1. A – A = O
2. O – A = O
3. A – U = O
Here, O is known as the empty set.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
What could then be the absolute complement of the empty set 0? Is it complement to itself?Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Spanding 2, we get A-A-A=O=A-A but that is like saying -2=0. Or is arithmetic logic broken in this set theory?
I like seeing everything as part of other areas to which they are not supposed to belong. So, we could say that 3 explains that an individual without a society is nothing. What is then U-A=?
This is a way to show that the entire universe is empty even though there are matter and energy.Originally Posted by Guille
The universe minus matter is just energy --- Universe - Matter = Energy or Universe - Energy = Matter.Originally Posted by Guille
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
I go with Einstein's E = mc2. Force is found within energy. There are different forces for different types of energy.Originally Posted by Guille
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Energy is the measure of change. Force is the agent of change. These definitions were taken from one advanced placement physics review book.Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)