Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 34
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    relative complements

    For the universal set U and subsets A, B of U, the following three identities are always true:

    1. AA = O
    2. O – A = O
    3. AU = O

    Here, O is known as the empty set.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: relative complements

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    For the universal set U and subsets A, B of U, the following three identities are always true:

    1. AA = O
    2. O – A = O
    3. AU = O

    Here, O is known as the empty set.
    Surely Antonio 0 is always empty,thats why it is set at zero!


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: relative complements

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    0 is always empty,thats why it is set at zero!
    What could then be the absolute complement of the empty set 0? Is it complement to itself?
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: relative complements

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    What could then be the absolute complement of the empty set 0? Is it complement to itself?
    No it does not,it leaves that task to us?

    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #5
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63

    Re: relative complements

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    For the universal set U and subsets A, B of U, the following three identities are always true:

    1. AA = O
    2. O – A = O
    3. AU = O

    Here, O is known as the empty set.
    Spanding 2, we get A-A-A=O=A-A but that is like saying -2=0. Or is arithmetic logic broken in this set theory?

    I like seeing everything as part of other areas to which they are not supposed to belong. So, we could say that 3 explains that an individual without a society is nothing. What is then U-A=?

  6. #6
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: relative complements

    Quote Originally Posted by Guille
    that is like saying -2=0
    This is a way to show that the entire universe is empty even though there are matter and energy.
    Quote Originally Posted by Guille
    What is then U-A=?
    The universe minus matter is just energy --- Universe - Matter = Energy or Universe - Energy = Matter.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  7. #7
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63

    Re: relative complements

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    The universe minus matter is just energy --- Universe - Matter = Energy or Universe - Energy = Matter.
    So, matter and energy are inverses of each other?

    Also, if Matter+Energy = Universe, what is the place of Force?

  8. #8
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: relative complements

    Quote Originally Posted by Guille
    So, matter and energy are inverses of each other? Also, if Matter+Energy = Universe, what is the place of Force?
    I go with Einstein's E = mc2. Force is found within energy. There are different forces for different types of energy.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  9. #9
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: relative complements

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    I go with Einstein's E = mc2. Force is found within energy. There are different forces for different types of energy.
    What would yousay Antonio,is the difference,if any,between energy and force,and say power?
    The reason I ask this Antonio is because I see only one energy within this universe,and
    not many,so are forces aspects of energy,or something different?


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  10. #10
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: relative complements

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    the difference,if any,between energy and force
    Energy is the measure of change. Force is the agent of change. These definitions were taken from one advanced placement physics review book.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Philosphical TOE (draft notes)
    By Jamesh in forum Your TOE Theory
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 01-31-2007, 06:27 PM
  2. Relative Charge Dynamics and Monopolar Theory
    By KAC in forum Your TOE Theory
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 06-30-2006, 07:47 AM
  3. speed of light
    By SinJin in forum General Physics
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 10-03-2005, 07:30 PM
  4. Gravity and Light
    By Guille in forum Relativity
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 05-23-2005, 02:56 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top