Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    sufficiently rigid

    Three necessary and sufficient conditions for rigidity of a particle are the following: (r2-r1)(v2-v1) = 0, (r3-r2)(v3-v2) = 0, and (r3-r1)(v3-v1) = 0. Applying the mass-time operator (p/v)(d/dt) to either the left or the right factors give the following: (p2-p1)(v2-v1) = 0, (p3-p2)(v3-v2) = 0, and (p3-p1)(v3-v1) = 0, and (r2-r1)(f2-f1) = 0, (r3-r2)(f3-f2) = 0, and (r3-r1)(f3-f1) = 0. The factors containing forces and space-time displacements could be used to describe the rigidity of the quantum vacuum. The following properties are necessary for reducing some of the factors: f1 ^ f2, f1 ^ r1, f1 ^ r2, f1 || f2, f1 || r1, f1 || r2, f2 ^ r1, f2 ^ r2, f2 || r1, f1 || r2, r1 || r2, r1 ^ r2 . Note that not all of these properties can be simultaneously satisfied.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile

    Are particles actually rigid Antonio?A rigid wave?Well prehaps if it were frozen seawater in
    the Bering sea!What say you of a rigid wave,or pulse.

    regards michael.
    Last edited by dleviwing; 03-18-2007 at 09:46 PM.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    Are particles actually rigid
    Rigidity is defined classical mechanically as the vanishing product of differences of radius vectors and differences of velocity vectors. For waves, their radius vectors could never be zero neither their velocity vectors which is constant for EM waves as speed of light.
    Last edited by dleviwing; 03-18-2007 at 09:46 PM.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. rigid vs. nonrigid transformations
    By AntonioLao in forum Your TOE Theory
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-26-2007, 01:56 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top