Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Tools > Mathematics
Reload this Page sufficiently rigid
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
sufficiently rigid
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
sufficiently rigid - 11-14-2006, 03:27 PM

Three necessary and sufficient conditions for rigidity of a particle are the following: (r2-r1)(v2-v1) = 0, (r3-r2)(v3-v2) = 0, and (r3-r1)(v3-v1) = 0. Applying the mass-time operator (p/v)(d/dt) to either the left or the right factors give the following: (p2-p1)(v2-v1) = 0, (p3-p2)(v3-v2) = 0, and (p3-p1)(v3-v1) = 0, and (r2-r1)(f2-f1) = 0, (r3-r2)(f3-f2) = 0, and (r3-r1)(f3-f1) = 0. The factors containing forces and space-time displacements could be used to describe the rigidity of the quantum vacuum. The following properties are necessary for reducing some of the factors: f1 ^ f2, f1 ^ r1, f1 ^ r2, f1 || f2, f1 || r1, f1 || r2, f2 ^ r1, f2 ^ r2, f2 || r1, f1 || r2, r1 || r2, r1 ^ r2 . Note that not all of these properties can be simultaneously satisfied.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,477
Thanks Given: 369
Thanked 791x in 727 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 98
   
Smile 02-25-2007, 07:35 PM

Are particles actually rigid Antonio?A rigid wave?Well prehaps if it were frozen seawater in
the Bering sea!What say you of a rigid wave,or pulse.

regards michael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?

Last edited by dleviwing : 03-18-2007 at 09:46 PM.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
02-26-2007, 01:52 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
Are particles actually rigid
Rigidity is defined classical mechanically as the vanishing product of differences of radius vectors and differences of velocity vectors. For waves, their radius vectors could never be zero neither their velocity vectors which is constant for EM waves as speed of light.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

Last edited by dleviwing : 03-18-2007 at 09:46 PM.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
rigid vs. nonrigid transformations AntonioLao Your TOE Theory 8 02-26-2007 01:56 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com