| | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,318
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 74 | radiative fixes -
12-05-2006, 01:41 PM
The divergence of Feynman one-loop propagator for bosons and fermions could have been replaced by a convergent integral and assuming the existence of fictitious massive particles with ghost couplings. Further simplification could have been accomplished by dimensional regularization. However, none of these fixes can give completely satisfactory explanation why low energy radiations always scatter away from their sources even though high energy ones interact, creating matter and energy profusely in a very short time. The explanatory inability and limitation could lie within the simplified Feynman diagram itself. Feynman diagram is constructed by a 1-space and 1-time axis analogous to the complex plane. Maybe out of respect for mathematical logic and desire for rules sticking, Feynman chose to keep silent the physical shortcomings of complex numbers outweighed by the usefulness in theoretical physics. Dimensionally speaking, the diagram is basically 2 dimensional (or two-valued), 1-space and 1-time dimension. Similarly, the complex plane is also 2 dimensional, 1-real and 1-imaginary. The imaginary part seems to correspond to the time part of Feynman diagrams and fittingly so since ideas of physical time remain personal states of mind, not something tangible. Subjectively, time is blatantly obvious and hopelessly inevitable. Objectively, it is mysteriously ambiguous and surprisingly reversible. Therefore, imaginary time allows achievement of single-valued physical quantities, e.g. mass, energy, temperature, density, volume, etc. furthermore time is also single valued parameter. A loop on a Feynman diagram describing its inside and outside in addition to its clockwise and counterclockwise rotation could become extremely complicated. A simpler approach is to choose a system where the center of the loop coincides with the origin of the complex plane. Then the loop becomes simply a complex circle of constant absolute value with arbitrary radius. The problem with this approach is the need for a transformation theory satisfying Lorentz invariance for every particle relative to every other particle. Nonetheless, this complex circle represents 1st power of energy in 2 dimensions. To represent 2nd power or square of energy in higher dimensions, it is necessary to link two complex circles together which would not share a common center but each of the two fundamental radius vectors have two end points serving as centers of each other. Traditionally, Dirac used spinors to describe squares of energy and spin in higher dimensions. His theory led to positive and negative energy solutions and so sensibly predicted the existence of antimatter. However, it is now well established that antimatter can only exist freely in an environment of extreme temperature (in the present universe, at much lower temperature, matter and antimatter are both slaved asymmetrically to each other as in a hydrogen atom of one proton and electron – mass ratio 1836 to 1), a condition ideally connected to the early universe of Planck’s energy, time, and length. Unfortunately, the existence of spinors is based on a theory of isotropic vectors of zero lengths with infinite degrees of freedom. These are complex circles where their radii vanish or set identically zero with infinitely ineffective directional attributes, nevertheless having 4p rotational symmetries known as the complex phase factors. Reasonably, these freed the theory of complicated shifting of origins. The fact that all hydrogen atoms behave almost (Lamb shifts) the same at the same physical conditions regardless of the spacetime locations suggests that the universal invariance lies within the surrounding quantum vacuum which could be described by singular Hadamard matrices of finite infinitesimal lengths. Coincidently, the surface area of a closed sphere of unit radius is also 4p. Therefore, the rotational symmetry of the complex phase factor is related to this area implying that closed volumes of any arbitrary particle could not be possible if the phase angles are less than or greater than 4p. These volume closure deficiencies appear as holes of Riemann surfaces of positive curvature. Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛ | |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,340
Thanks Given: 348
Thanked 703x in 655 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 94 | Re: radiative fixes -
02-25-2007, 09:06 PM
To fix a point we need to know where to place our marker,do we not?This is the nub of the problem,as I see it,what about you,Antonio?
regards michael. Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | | | | 2nd degree Black Belt
Status: Offline Posts: 324
Thanks Given: 24
Thanked 8x in 8 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2006 Rep Power: 10 | Re: radiative fixes -
02-26-2007, 10:02 AM
My personal feeling on the issue tends toward being able to map out a near infinite boundary condition called condition. Only by doing this do hydrogen atoms have their own identies apart from 4pi, which is inherently The convienient diagram for chaotic spirals. | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,318
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 74 | Re: radiative fixes -
02-26-2007, 02:38 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick To fix a point we need to know where to place our marker,do we not? | In a quantum universe, the act of placing a marker will definitely disturb the system such that the position becomes certain but the momentum becomes uncertain. Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛ | |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,340
Thanks Given: 348
Thanked 703x in 655 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 94 | Re: radiative fixes -
02-26-2007, 03:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao In a quantum universe, the act of placing a marker will definitely disturb the system such that the position becomes certain but the momentum becomes uncertain. | Maybe the system needs disturbing,as this may well produce a wake,which will reveal
a hidden element?
regards michael. Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,318
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 74 | Re: radiative fixes -
02-26-2007, 04:03 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Maybe the system needs disturbing | If we can initiate a positive disturbance on the true vacuum then we can get limitless energy. Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛ | |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,340
Thanks Given: 348
Thanked 703x in 655 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 94 | Re: radiative fixes -
02-26-2007, 06:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao If we can initiate a positive disturbance on the true vacuum then we can get limitless energy. | We need then too both enter a sustained state of Samhedhi open up a gravity well
where we will then both encounter a quantum download of superconsciousness which
we can then both focus this energy download into a magnetic storage container for
future use!
regards michael. Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,318
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 74 | Re: radiative fixes -
02-27-2007, 04:24 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick open up a gravity well | Energy coming out of the well equivalent to anti-gravity. Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛ | |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,340
Thanks Given: 348
Thanked 703x in 655 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 94 | Re: radiative fixes -
02-27-2007, 06:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao Energy coming out of the well equivalent to anti-gravity. |
Yes I believe it would,and as long as one sustained that state,the well would remain open
for business!
regards michael. Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,318
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 74 | Re: radiative fixes -
02-28-2007, 03:53 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick the well would remain open for business! | Expelling squares of energy or just plain energy? Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛ | |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com | |