countess of mantissa

[AntonioLao]

Is she real or imaginary? Is she just a figment of mathematical imagination? Or is she a physical geometric progression? She has always provided mathematicians and physicists alike with numerical certitudes that irreversible entropy exists and also helps them tame large numbers approaching infinity. Without her services logarithms are valueless hence antilogarithms become meaningless. Consequently, no physical theory could possibly exist. She asserts that probability will eventually reached absolute certainty but it will never go beyond unity or sink below vacuity. Try hard as she can, she could never be normalized or even renormalized. Commonly, in the house of ten-fold symmetry, she shows up only for all fractional powers of her bases, while vanishes if the powers are fully integrated. The degree of her charming character increases for larger and larger numbers but becomes zero at exactly one. Her negative character sadly appears for all lesser numbers that could not complete a whole. In the world of mathematics, she is truly real. However, her moods swing between 1 and 0. Zero, when her power is fully transcended. Nevertheless, she is completely unified when she reaches the end of eternity. The following sites said something about her: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Mantissa.html and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mantissa and http://www.thefreedictionary.com/mantissa.

[theunify]

The function x-[x]=m shows that when x is a whole number m clearly equals zero, yet if x is not a whole number the mantasi clearly has to be added to x to equal N.

If we suppose that N is absolute then when m=0 we must conclude that an arbitrary step of adding zero is not required and that instead we should regard m=1 and multiply that by x to get N.

This satifies if x=0, then MX0 also equals x=0=m.

Unity and 0 seem to be interchangable if we remember when we need to change them back.

Antonio is this soo complex that only 5 of us will understand it or is it soo simple that everyone rejects it??? I believe it's too simple to attract the collective conscienceness.

[mkirkpatrick]

Antonio,you do post some posers,you say "nevertheless she is completely unified when
she reaches the end of eternity"well as this will never happen,otherwise it would be called
relativity,and not eternity,we are then left with partial resolution,are we not?


regards michael.

[theunify]

Good Morning Hope I'm not waking any of you up,
M seems to operate the same whether it equals 0 or 1, therefore we can consider Mantissa to be a closed Universe; and yes there is a mathematical way to infinity if we consider the whole number to be a steady state and the matissa to be a trancendental number increasing in magnitude.

However the problem arises when M=.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 999999...etc.
When it gets there the whole number simultaneiously changes and the Mantissa function collapses to reaveal that we can treat 0 and 1 such that a Mantissa of 0 sometimes equals a Mantissa of 1 but the operations of addition and multiplication lose their meaning.

0 + X = Y
1 * X = Y, when M is "non-existant"

[AntonioLao]

well as this will never happen

How can you be so sure? The answer lies in the afterlife aka infinity.

but the operations of addition and multiplication lose their meaning.

By then who needs mathematicians but philosophers?

[theunify]

How can you be so sure? The answer lies in the afterlife aka infinity.

By then who needs mathematicians but philosophers?

In terms of Mathematics I mean that the operations reach equality at a certain point. It's not a broad stroke of Glamour.

[mkirkpatrick]

How can you be so sure? The answer lies in the afterlife aka infinity.

By then who needs mathematicians but philosophers?

In the afterlife,in the etheric universe,out of phase with the physical one.well then
okay I guess then mattissa could be re-con-siled.


regards michael.

[theunify]

In the afterlife,in the etheric universe,out of phase with the physical one.well then
okay I guess then mattissa could be re-con-siled.


regards michael.

Yes Michael. Your name is Michael.
Have you ever witnessed the etheric Universe, or the limits that your brain will allow? Have you ever closed your eyes, but then told your brain to see what it is that your eyelids are? Have you ever rubbed your eyelids while closed, to reveal a pattern, ever changing, but etheric as you see what is dark, but what is "slightly illuminated" you can try this it takes about 3 minutes. Close your eyes, gently place your fingers on top of the eyelids and apply very small pressure, when you start to see "green" or otherwise shapes try and focuse on those and they will evolve, focuse on the more evolved shapes and they too will evolve. If you can't see anything open your eye lids for a little short time and the light will enter and bounce around, then close them and keep them shut with your fingers on top, the light should reveal itself, in its true form, there is quite a wonder to it all, any exploit we can use to understand the TOE is a good one, this just happens to exploit our lack of vision in anything other than visible light, so that when we have our eyes close any visible light remains and eminates, and registers as very interesting shapes, clouds in forms. I admit I havent done this in a while but just tried it, It's much like staring at a light bulb, then blicking and seeing that same light source in your field of vision wherever you walk.

[theunify]

After your done just blink 20 times to get that blurry feeling away.

[sillysally]

Zero always has a value equal to one.

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0

See, that is 11 numbers, 0 + 1 = 2

Add them up (with 0 as 1 value)

0+1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+0 = 47 which equals 11 which equals 2.

Two ones equal 11. 11 always equals 2.

You never start at 1 but you always end at 0.

So,

0+0=2
0+0=01
0+0=11
0+0=29
0+0=38
0+0=47
0+0=56
0+0=65
0+0=74
0+0=83
0+0=92
0+0=10

.

In essence, counting tangible values begins at 2 because 1 cannot go to 2 without 0 first, that is why 0+1=2. 1+1 DOES NOT EQUAL 2. 1+1=1, the value remains the same because one is always equal to itself as 11 is always equal to 2. Only 0 and 1 can be equal and remain as 1 ONLY. Unless it is 11 then it is 2. In this case, somebody tell me how to get 3 before my brain implodes.


Stop it with those stupid letters x=y, that is hard for layman like me to understand.