Is he good? Is bad? Or is ugly? Does he relies on the natural counting numbers to show that zero does not exist? The set of whole numbers does include zero. However, reality does not. If reality includes the empty set then it is always empty since the product of the empty set with any nonempty set is always the empty set while the sum of the empty set with any nonempty set only shows super-symmetric reflexive identity. Take away the empty set then reality is back to being naturally countable.
The counting process of reality always begins with unity and ends with infinity. Counting backward depends on negative unity which at an absolute maximum begins at infinity. No matter how many negative unities are subtracted infinity remains infinite. No count can reach it or run away from it either positively or negatively. Therefore, if the count is trapped inside the house of infinity, he stays inside forever even if he is able to achieve light’s absolute velocity.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

