The general math of Truth.

[theunify]

Truth tables
The truth values for a logical construction are given unambiguously by truth tables, one for each connectivesuch as “and” and “or”. For example, from the tables shown here you can see immediately that if P is true and Q is false, then “P and Q” is false but “P or Q” is true.

P Q P and Q
T T T
T F F
F T F
F F F


P Q P or Q
T T T
T F T
F T T
F F F


*copied from various sources fair-use policy

[bottomlander]

Dear theunity,

Yes, you posted something of Logical Truth. What will be the application in your next step?

The point is, there are too many things or arguments unable to apply falsification. They are not either True or False (or neutral). Many reasonings are vague, non-scientific.

You mentioned conscience in a negative mood else where in toequest forum. Really, metaphysics are of course meaningful to human lifes and philosophy. But seems not subject to True or False, just non-applicable to scientific reasoning. This is one of the reasons why TOE or The Truth is so controversy.

Regards. bottomlander

[theunify]

WU Chi Kay; as in a Clan of Human Settlers?

What is the general math of migration???

submission
theunify

[bottomlander]

WU Chi Kay; as in a Clan of Human Settlers?

What is the general math of migration???

theunify

Dear theunify,

Glad to receive your two points:
1) as in a Clan of Human Settlers: When registered/migrated to toequest.com, you remarked that you were from Wake Island. Coincidently, I remarked that I were from bottomland. Great minds are alike!
2) I don't know the general math of migration or the likes. Coincident again, I am now formulating some Indexes or Checkpoints. Is it somewhat appliable with your Truth Tables?

Regards. bottomlander

[theunify]

Can you make a seperate thread for this new idea of yours?

[bottomlander]

Can you make a seperate thread for this new idea of yours?

Dear theunify,

Sorry for being the first reader to make response to your new/fresh thread "The general math of Truth". After re-read my 1st & 2nd posts, I still cannot catch up what part made you annoy. Is it the part that I awaited your next step upon your Truth Table?

As for for my 2nd reply. I tried my best to think about a possible or future usage after I encountered with your Truth Table. I think most people like readers to rely upon their promoted item (for this case, it is your promoted Truth Table).

I read some of your articles, it is quite nice (within those Top Theories ever posted in toequest). Have many groundbreaking good points.
It will be a loss to human if people are not allowed to make responses and unable to follow your threads/articles.

I don't know why people have a bad habbit, they don't access those threads that have too little readers and too little replies. I think your thread "The general math of Truth" has established enough attractions for those who only spend their limited surfing time to view popular threads as indicacted by no. of viewers and no. of replies.

As for your suggestion for me to start a new thread. I will follow your advice when time has come. For posting the new ideas, indexing/checkpoints seems not a new idea to most people. Anyhow, I hope that you'll make comments to my indexing/checkpoints once I posted it out. (at least after 2 months because my speed of writing is very slow)

Regards. bottomlander