LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksThe proper geometric description of virtual screening is a closed volume. Since what close the volume are virtual particles the resulting volume is a virtual volume. Its existence is only possible when there are unequally effective secondary attractive forces. However, the quantum vacuum I completely dominated by equal repulsive primary forces whose nature remains unclear. One singular primary force is all that is necessary to force a real hole appearing on the external convex surface of the virtual volume. On the other hand, if there appear infinitely many point-sources of primary force then the virtual volume becomes a real volume composed of an infinite number of real holes for the next level of virtual screening to take place. This process continues ad infinitum.
Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 10 of 14
Thread: virtual screening
- 02-23-2007, 12:31 PM #1Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
virtual screening
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 02-26-2007, 06:42 PM #2Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,621
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 295
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: virtual screening What is it that is actiually being screened though?
Originally Posted by AntonioLao 
regards michaelHumilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 02-27-2007, 04:37 PM #3Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: virtual screening
The naked truth. In physics, it's called the bare mass. Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 02-27-2007, 06:19 PM #4Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,621
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 295
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: virtual screening Originally Posted by AntonioLao
What then does bare mass reveal,that clothed mass conceals?
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 02-28-2007, 03:37 PM #5Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: virtual screening
It reveals the shocking truth about infinity. Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 02-28-2007, 08:28 PM #6Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,621
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 295
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: virtual screening Originally Posted by AntonioLao
You mean that it is twice as big as before thought?
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 03-01-2007, 01:27 PM #7Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: virtual screening
The magnitude of point-mass, point-force, point-charge or point-anything is always infinity. Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 03-01-2007, 07:29 PM #8Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,621
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 295
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: virtual screening Originally Posted by AntonioLao
I feel more comfortable with that concept,plenty of room for manoeuvre.elbow room!
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 03-02-2007, 02:55 PM #9Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: virtual screening
Actually the area of application is zero and division by zero is undefined in current accepted mathematics. Some said it's infinity. Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 03-02-2007, 07:26 PM #10Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,621
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 295
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: virtual screening Ok then what do you say! Originally Posted by AntonioLao
regards michaelHumilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Reply With QuoteThread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
The Uncertainty Principle
By Robert in forum AnomaliesReplies: 21Last Post: 07-26-2009, 08:26 PM -
virtual particles need TLC
By AntonioLao in forum General PhysicsReplies: 13Last Post: 03-05-2007, 04:13 PM -
The Quantum Radiation Theory of First Cause
By Lloyd Gillespie in forum Your TOE TheoryReplies: 14Last Post: 01-19-2007, 04:40 PM -
virtual energy
By AntonioLao in forum General PhysicsReplies: 3Last Post: 11-10-2006, 08:05 PM -
Question.
By socratus in forum SpacetimeReplies: 11Last Post: 02-20-2006, 10:02 AM
Posting Permissions
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.11
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:37 AM.
vBulletin 4.0 skin by CompleteVB
