LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksThe process of extracting the original waveform from an infinite harmonic Fourier series is known as Fourier inversion. On the other hand, a process of extracting fundamental waveforms from the quantum vacuum is called absolute inversion. The components of absolute inversion are absolute frequency, absolute wavelength, absolute phase, and absolute period. If absolute angular frequency w is 2pn then the absolute period t is 2p/wor 1/nthen the absolute acceleration is given by a=nl/r.
Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 10 of 12
Thread: absolute inversion
- 02-23-2007, 02:16 PM #1Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
absolute inversion
Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛
- 02-23-2007, 05:04 PM #2Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,621
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 295
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: absolute inversion Antonio it would be immensely difficult to extract the original waveform,as this would
Originally Posted by AntonioLao 
be in effect removing the WILL from the Absolute?Or do you imagine another possibility?
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 02-26-2007, 12:05 PM #3Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: absolute inversion
In that case, we just sit still and let the waves do their own self inversion. Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛
- 02-26-2007, 08:00 PM #4Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,621
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 295
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: absolute inversion Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Thats right,be still,and let it happen!
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 02-28-2007, 05:01 PM #5Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: absolute inversion
Complete motionlessness is undoubtedly a part of the teachings of Buddhism. Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛
- 02-28-2007, 06:52 PM #6Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,621
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 295
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: absolute inversion You are absolutely right there Antonio,but I would further venture to say,that universal Originally Posted by AntonioLao
motion is born out of universal motionlessness.
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 03-01-2007, 12:09 PM #7Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: absolute inversion
If the linear momentum of the universe is zero then it is motionless but which cannot be proven by the motions of galaxies inside it. Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛
- 03-01-2007, 08:57 PM #8Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,621
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 295
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: absolute inversion Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Thats absolutely right.
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 03-06-2007, 03:13 PM #9Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: absolute inversion
Asserted by Newton's 3rd law of motion and the law of linear momentum conservation. see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_laws_of_motion and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_law Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛
- 03-06-2007, 03:20 PM #10Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,621
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 295
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: absolute inversion Originally Posted by AntonioLao
You would be a very foolish man to argue with that,right!
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Reply With QuoteThread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
big bang’s primary cause
By AntonioLao in forum CosmologyReplies: 120Last Post: 02-11-2012, 02:20 AM -
absolute frequency
By AntonioLao in forum General PhysicsReplies: 1Last Post: 02-22-2007, 06:54 PM -
Absolute Fundamentals
By dleviwing in forum Forces of NatureReplies: 46Last Post: 11-23-2006, 08:39 PM -
About absolute reference frame……
By socratus in forum CosmologyReplies: 1Last Post: 04-05-2006, 06:00 PM
Posting Permissions
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.11
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:37 AM.
vBulletin 4.0 skin by CompleteVB
