LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksThe growth of plants seems to follow the Fibonacci sequence: 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, etc. On the other hand, binary branching is 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, etc. The Fibonacci sequence seems like an arithmetic sequence with no common difference while the binary sequence is a geometric sequence with common ratio of 2. The first regulates the growth of many living things. The second was responsible for the dreaded radioactive decay of heavy nuclei.
If a process of continued differences is applied to the Fibonacci sequence it is possible to derive alternating negative integers such that the sequence now appears as 0, 1, -1, 2, -3, 5, -8, 13, -21, 34, -55, 89, etc. This expanded sequence could be used to explain the asymmetry of baryon and anti-baryon number in cosmology.
Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 10 of 20
Thread: tree branching
- 02-26-2007, 03:58 PM #1Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
tree branching
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 02-26-2007, 04:43 PM #2Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,621
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 295
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: tree branching Would that then suggest an involutionary cycle commencing?
Originally Posted by AntonioLao 
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 02-27-2007, 03:55 PM #3Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: tree branching
And also evolutionary cycle commencing? Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 02-27-2007, 07:36 PM #4Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,621
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 295
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: tree branching Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Right,well that is very illuminating,the tree is branching out all over?
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 02-28-2007, 04:21 PM #5Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: tree branching
To keep them away from high tension electric power lines, a lot of tree are being amputated in my neighborhood streets losing their Fibonacci birthright. Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 02-28-2007, 07:37 PM #6Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,621
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 295
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: tree branching Originally Posted by AntonioLao
We must make a stand,but not out of wood though?
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 03-01-2007, 12:40 PM #7Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: tree branching
This reminds me of the proliferation of metallic electric power poles substituting wooden poles. Forest conservationists would downright be very happy. Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 03-01-2007, 08:10 PM #8Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,621
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 295
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: tree branching Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Thats right,here in the UK,they are also using metal poles for mobile phone masts.
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 03-02-2007, 03:30 PM #9Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: tree branching
Are we then moving back to the Iron Age? see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_Age Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 03-02-2007, 06:27 PM #10Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,621
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 295
- Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: tree branching Originally Posted by AntonioLao
No I do not think so,gosh perish the thought!
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Reply With QuoteThread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
What is truth,can we know it?
By mkirkpatrick in forum Philosophical ThoughtReplies: 237Last Post: 05-05-2012, 07:53 AM -
"human thought" is a matter?
By unified8 in forum IntroductionsReplies: 27Last Post: 08-09-2011, 02:40 PM -
Is happiness real?
By Guille in forum ConsciousnessReplies: 86Last Post: 02-03-2011, 05:54 PM
Posting Permissions
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.11
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:41 AM.
vBulletin 4.0 skin by CompleteVB
