Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    spatial inversion

    Spatial inversion is defined as changing the sign of all coordinates. On the other hand, polarized space is possible only if certain directions are defined. For eight directional properties the 3D bases are (1, 1, 1), (-1, 1, 1), (1, -1, 1), (1, 1, -1), (1, -1, -1), (-1, 1, -1), (-1, -1, 1), (-1, -1, -1). Extending to 4D time asymmetry gives sixteen 4D bases of spacetime inversion.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    735
    Blog Entries
    12
    Thanks Given
    137
    Thanked 162x in 138 Posts
    Rep Power
    28

    Re: spatial inversion

    Is time the cap so to speak that contains all other dimensions? When this cap is removed does this signify the objects are in a paralell Universe? How can we be sure without the time dimension that the object is in fact in our physical reality and not in the ephemeral dimensions of space-time.

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: spatial inversion

    Quote Originally Posted by theunify
    Is time the cap so to speak that contains all other dimensions?
    In spacetime inversion, time is just one of the bases. Special and General relativity used either (1, 1, 1, -1) or (-1, -1, -1, 1). These are just two of the sixteen possible bases that could exist. In this sense, both special and general relativity did not account for the complete description of spacetime structures, globally nor locally.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The philosophy and Attributes of ETHER
    By dleviwing in forum General Phenomena
    Replies: 88
    Last Post: 05-04-2010, 03:59 PM
  2. absolute inversion
    By AntonioLao in forum Mathematics
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 03-06-2007, 04:15 PM
  3. Philosphical TOE (draft notes)
    By Jamesh in forum Your TOE Theory
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 01-31-2007, 06:27 PM
  4. Over 33 new spatial dimensions discovered!
    By Tesla in forum General Physics
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 08-19-2006, 10:54 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top