Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    magnetic topology

    No matter how magnetic field lines twist and turn if they are all frozen within certain plasma fluid then their magnetic topologies remain unchanged. Using knots theory http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knot_theory different magnetic topologies can be described successfully. It is commonly agreed by topologists that actual cutting or tearing of knots is not allowed. Therefore, all knots regardless of their complexity must all be closed loops. To say that two topologies are not equivalent is the same as saying that no amount of twisting, reorienting, loosening, or tightening will ever transform one into the other, for example: a donut into a Twinkie.

    Even though magnetic monopole could not be found, it is still possible to talk about its topology. Just how many distinct magnetic topologies can there be? For electricity, there are the positive and the negative topology. No matter how much energy is emitted or absorbed into a negative charge it could never become a positive charge. On the other hand in high energy experiments units of energy could always be converted into equal half units of positive and half units of negative and sometimes into three equal thirds of neutral particle give or take some asymmetries.

    Electric current is what moves modern technology. However, magnetic current does not. Is it because it does not exist? On the contrary, it does exist and its speed must be superluminal. It is these superluminal speeds of magnetic monopoles that allow them distinct topologies. At light speed, all these different topologies merged into one topology when magnetism merged with electricity becoming electromagnetism.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: magnetic topology

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    No matter how magnetic field lines twist and turn if they are all frozen within certain plasma fluid then their magnetic topologies remain unchanged. Using knots theory http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knot_theory different magnetic topologies can be described successfully. It is commonly agreed by topologists that actual cutting or tearing of knots is not allowed. Therefore, all knots regardless of their complexity must all be closed loops. To say that two topologies are not equivalent is the same as saying that no amount of twisting, reorienting, loosening, or tightening will ever transform one into the other, for example: a donut into a Twinkie.

    Even though magnetic monopole could not be found, it is still possible to talk about its topology. Just how many distinct magnetic topologies can there be? For electricity, there are the positive and the negative topology. No matter how much energy is emitted or absorbed into a negative charge it could never become a positive charge. On the other hand in high energy experiments units of energy could always be converted into equal half units of positive and half units of negative and sometimes into three equal thirds of neutral particle give or take some asymmetries.

    Electric current is what moves modern technology. However, magnetic current does not. Is it because it does not exist? On the contrary, it does exist and its speed must be superluminal. It is these superluminal speeds of magnetic monopoles that allow them distinct topologies. At light speed, all these different topologies merged into one topology when magnetism merged with electricity becoming electromagnetism.

    prehaps another name for magnetic current then could be Will?

    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: magnetic topology

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    prehaps another name for magnetic current then could be Will?
    Motion exists in magnetic current. Could motion exists in Will?
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: magnetic topology

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Motion exists in magnetic current. Could motion exists in Will?
    Yes it most certainly could.


    regards michael
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #5
    Green Belt
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    65
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 2x in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    12

    Re: magnetic topology

    Magnetic current is electric current. The structure of iron atoms allows them to be easily aligned so that the electrons are concentrated on one side. Other materials can form stronger magnets at lower temperatures. The requirement for two poles is similar to the need for a piece of string to have either 2 of 0 ends. The speed of this current is not superluminal, as far as I am aware.

  6. #6
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: magnetic topology

    Quote Originally Posted by Cubola Zaruka
    Magnetic current is electric current
    Classically speaking not quantum mechanically speaking similar to the distinction of locality and nonlocality.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. ready next level of science
    By truedreamm in forum Your TOE Theory
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-27-2007, 10:33 AM
  2. coming soon finaltheory
    By truedreamm in forum Your TOE Theory
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 12-02-2006, 04:45 PM
  3. Is there a magnetic field in the room?
    By wisp in forum General Physics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-16-2005, 12:18 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top