ToeQuest

We're going on a TOE Quest!


Register

Reply

Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
04-03-2007, 01:54 PM
negative time

Time appears explicitly as a conjugate variable of the uncertainty inequality given by DeDth. This says that the product of change in energy with the change in time is always greater than or equal to Planck’s constant of action, h. If De=e1-e2 and Dt=t1-t2then simple algebraic expansion gives e1t1-e1t2-e2t1-e2t2. This can be separated into two linearly independent inequalities with the action evenly distributed for symmetry: e11t1-e12t2≥½h and -e21t1+e22t2≥½h then solving them for the cases of equality, the three determinants needed for finding t1 and t2 are ½h(e22-e12), ½h(e11-e21), and e11e22-e12e21. Then t1=½h(e22-e12)/(e11e22-e12e21) and t2=½h(e11-e21)/ (e11e22-e12e21). For negative time either e22<e12 or e11<e21 but not both.

For the case where e11=e22<e12=e21, then t1 and t2 reverted to being positive. However, the Fourier inversion gives the frequency domains as f1=f2=2(e11+e12)/h. For the trivial case where e11=e12 then n=f1=f2=4e/h such that the zero-point energy is given by e°hn. In general, the action can be evenly distributed into n energy equipartitions such that there exists n rational factors and that r1=r2=r3=…=rn where r1+r2+r3+…+rn=1. This normalization is clearly a probabilistic requirement. Note that negative time does not necessarily imply negative energy. It can only indicate time’s directional property as a vector quantity.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Moderator

mkirkpatrick's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,749
Blog Entries: 4
103 mkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud of
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
04-03-2007, 02:17 PM
Smile Re: negative time

Are you implying or actually meaning that this is time reversal?Flowing in an opposite
direction,or does this mean something entirely different.Does then positive time flow
in a forward direction.


regards michael.
__________________
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Reply With Quote
mkirkpatrick is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
04-03-2007, 03:39 PM
Re: negative time

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
Are you implying or actually meaning that this is time reversal?
Not time reversal. If you follow the math arguments then you probably surmise that negative time is just energy differences. If energy now is more than energy tomorrow then time is moving forward but if the energy tomorrow is more than energy today then time is moving backward. Decreasing energy in a system indicates forward time movements. Increasing energy in a system indicates backward time movement. Since energy is constantly being dissipated from our body we tend to grow old but if we eat food and nutrients we tend to stop aging or even reverse time for a few instants.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Moderator

mkirkpatrick's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,749
Blog Entries: 4
103 mkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud of
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
04-03-2007, 06:52 PM
Smile Re: negative time

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
Not time reversal. If you follow the math arguments then you probably surmise that negative time is just energy differences. If energy now is more than energy tomorrow then time is moving forward but if the energy tomorrow is more than energy today then time is moving backward. Decreasing energy in a system indicates forward time movements. Increasing energy in a system indicates backward time movement. Since energy is constantly being dissipated from our body we tend to grow old but if we eat food and nutrients we tend to stop aging or even reverse time for a few instants.
You have made the concept much clearer,thanks.Maybe if we kept eating non-stop
we would return to childhood?


regards michael.
__________________
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Reply With Quote
mkirkpatrick is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
04-05-2007, 05:28 PM
Re: negative time

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
Maybe if we kept eating non-stop we would return to childhood?
This is the surest way leading to obesity not to longevity. The key is energy. Once it is kept at a constant rate of exchange (energy out equals energy in) then a thermodynamic equilibrium is reached and entropy remains constant.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Moderator

mkirkpatrick's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,749
Blog Entries: 4
103 mkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud ofmkirkpatrick has much to be proud of
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
04-05-2007, 07:16 PM
Smile Re: negative time

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
This is the surest way leading to obesity not to longevity. The key is energy. Once it is kept at a constant rate of exchange (energy out equals energy in) then a thermodynamic equilibrium is reached and entropy remains constant.
Thats right,I was jesting of course.We could maintain that equilibrium,however physically
we would still die!



regards michael.
__________________
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Reply With Quote
mkirkpatrick is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
04-07-2007, 01:38 PM
Re: negative time

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
We could maintain that equilibrium,however physically we would still die!
For creatures living locked within the yokes of 6-fold symmetry death is unavoidable. However, if existence can be linked to 8-fold symmetry then it is possible to extend human lifespan. This extension not necessarily implies negative time but just high energy states.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:13 PM. Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 VBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys.