Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: negative time

  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    negative time

    Time appears explicitly as a conjugate variable of the uncertainty inequality given by DeDth. This says that the product of change in energy with the change in time is always greater than or equal to Planck’s constant of action, h. If De=e1-e2 and Dt=t1-t2then simple algebraic expansion gives e1t1-e1t2-e2t1-e2t2. This can be separated into two linearly independent inequalities with the action evenly distributed for symmetry: e11t1-e12t2≥½h and -e21t1+e22t2≥½h then solving them for the cases of equality, the three determinants needed for finding t1 and t2 are ½h(e22-e12), ½h(e11-e21), and e11e22-e12e21. Then t1=½h(e22-e12)/(e11e22-e12e21) and t2=½h(e11-e21)/ (e11e22-e12e21). For negative time either e22<e12 or e11<e21 but not both.

    For the case where e11=e22<e12=e21, then t1 and t2 reverted to being positive. However, the Fourier inversion gives the frequency domains as f1=f2=2(e11+e12)/h. For the trivial case where e11=e12 then n=f1=f2=4e/h such that the zero-point energy is given by e°hn. In general, the action can be evenly distributed into n energy equipartitions such that there exists n rational factors and that r1=r2=r3=…=rn where r1+r2+r3+…+rn=1. This normalization is clearly a probabilistic requirement. Note that negative time does not necessarily imply negative energy. It can only indicate time’s directional property as a vector quantity.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: negative time

    Are you implying or actually meaning that this is time reversal?Flowing in an opposite
    direction,or does this mean something entirely different.Does then positive time flow
    in a forward direction.


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: negative time

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    Are you implying or actually meaning that this is time reversal?
    Not time reversal. If you follow the math arguments then you probably surmise that negative time is just energy differences. If energy now is more than energy tomorrow then time is moving forward but if the energy tomorrow is more than energy today then time is moving backward. Decreasing energy in a system indicates forward time movements. Increasing energy in a system indicates backward time movement. Since energy is constantly being dissipated from our body we tend to grow old but if we eat food and nutrients we tend to stop aging or even reverse time for a few instants.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: negative time

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Not time reversal. If you follow the math arguments then you probably surmise that negative time is just energy differences. If energy now is more than energy tomorrow then time is moving forward but if the energy tomorrow is more than energy today then time is moving backward. Decreasing energy in a system indicates forward time movements. Increasing energy in a system indicates backward time movement. Since energy is constantly being dissipated from our body we tend to grow old but if we eat food and nutrients we tend to stop aging or even reverse time for a few instants.
    You have made the concept much clearer,thanks.Maybe if we kept eating non-stop
    we would return to childhood?


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: negative time

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    Maybe if we kept eating non-stop we would return to childhood?
    This is the surest way leading to obesity not to longevity. The key is energy. Once it is kept at a constant rate of exchange (energy out equals energy in) then a thermodynamic equilibrium is reached and entropy remains constant.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: negative time

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    This is the surest way leading to obesity not to longevity. The key is energy. Once it is kept at a constant rate of exchange (energy out equals energy in) then a thermodynamic equilibrium is reached and entropy remains constant.
    Thats right,I was jesting of course.We could maintain that equilibrium,however physically
    we would still die!



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  7. #7
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: negative time

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    We could maintain that equilibrium,however physically we would still die!
    For creatures living locked within the yokes of 6-fold symmetry death is unavoidable. However, if existence can be linked to 8-fold symmetry then it is possible to extend human lifespan. This extension not necessarily implies negative time but just high energy states.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top