bracket conditions

[AntonioLao]

Bracket conditions were formalized as quantum conditions for describing the non-commutative products of dynamical observables, known as Poisson brackets of quantum mechanics (QM). Before their appearances, continuous parenthetical conditions appeared throughout classical physics including general relativity.

In the real numbers domain, extreme bracket conditions are often indicated by the following: [-¥,¥], [0,¥], and [-¥,0] or parenthetically (-¥,¥), (0,¥), and (-¥,0). Unfortunately none of these could set realistic lower or upper bound of dynamical variables. When probability was introduced into QM, the bracket condition would have been [0,1]. However, the parenthetical one, (0,1) is more plausible since random variables of computational probability rarely take on values of exactly zeros or exactly ones. On the other hand, no one could hardly say that they have seen bracket conditions for negative probability as [-1,0] or (-1,0). They describe products of antiparticles as well as Dirac equation with its spinors. When these negative and positive conditions are combined together, the resulting Abelian conditions [-1,1] and (-1,1) could represent squares of energy.

[mkirkpatrick]

Whether real or imaginal bracket conditions impose a constraint on what is free flowing
energy,thereby causing incorrect data to be percieved,and deflecting attention away from
the primary source of energy.


regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

Whether real or imaginal bracket conditions

Conditions involving the use of complex numbers or imaginary numbers are out. I am eliminating them from appearing in elements of matrices.

[mkirkpatrick]

Conditions involving the use of complex numbers or imaginary numbers are out. I am eliminating them from appearing in elements of matrices.

Thats boldness speaking,strike out there,warrior of the cold-fusion image!

that without form,is truly taking shape?



regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

that without form,is truly taking shape?

Last week I was looking into magnetic susceptibility and what I found out is that it is mostly related to quantum spin. Furthermore, quantum spins take on only two values 1 and -1.

[mkirkpatrick]

Last week I was looking into magnetic susceptibility and what I found out is that it is mostly related to quantum spin. Furthermore, quantum spins take on only two values 1 and -1.

Quantum spin can take us all for a ride,if we misread the phenomena presenting.?




regards michael.