Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: binary casualty

  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    binary casualty

    In the natural world, there are far more binary operators than unary, tertiary, or quaternary. The word pentanary could be used to signify operations with exactly five operands. As strange as it may seems, when considering the first 4 regular polygons of equilateral triangle, square, pentagon, and hexagon, only the pentagon has its number of sides equal to its number of diagonals. The regular triangle has 3 sides but no diagonals. The square has 4 sides with 2 diagonals. The pentagon has 5 sides and also 5 diagonals. The hexagon has 6 sides but 9 diagonals. The heptagon has 7 sides and 14 diagonals, etc. The formula for finding the number of diagonals for any polygon is n(n-3)/2 where n is the number of sides.

    If the diagonals of a polygon signify inner connections and the sides signify outer connections then it is clear that only the pentagon has a perfect balance between its inner and outer space connections. The great Renaissance man Leonardo da Vinci himself had noted the power of the pentanary connection and he used this to represent his famous Vitruvian Man painting http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitruvian_Man. Therefore, it can be hypothesized that a complete connection for inner space is 5 binary connections and the same number for complete outer space connection.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: binary casualty

    Antonio,this is a most profound connection you have made here,the pentagon,5 binary
    connections inner,and 5 binary connections outer,this represents the perfect number
    which is 10,but it is drawn as a one,enclosed within a circle,exactly like the one you
    did for me a while back,which was for another thread,A blue circle,with a red 1 within it.



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: binary casualty

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    this is a most profound connection you have made here,the pentagon,5 binary connections inner,and 5 binary connections outer
    Thanks for noticing. I am hoping this will give an idea about cold fusion.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile

    You have here Antonio the key to limitless energy,turn it slowly,one click at a time?

    regards michael.
    Last edited by dleviwing; 06-03-2007 at 03:13 PM.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: binary casualty

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    turn it slowly,one click at a time
    If we do that, the pentagons oriented in 3D would form a dodecahedron http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodecahedron. I more interested in controlling the magnetic field intensities and configurations. For these, it is necessary to artificially create sheet atoms beyond the transuranic elements.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-03-2008, 06:44 AM
  2. binary confrontation
    By AntonioLao in forum Psychology
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 03-15-2006, 03:44 AM
  3. Fractal Dialectics
    By Mike 5 in forum Theorems and Conjectures
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 01-05-2006, 12:48 PM
  4. ToE and Unified theory
    By Caijin Salter in forum The High Level View
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 03-30-2005, 12:59 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top