Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    cold quark fusion

    The nuclear reaction for cold fusion is D+D®He+energy. In term of quarks: uud+uud+udd+udd®6u6d+energy. The gauge matrix for up quark is (5,1). The 5 is the alpha entry and the 1 is the beta entry of (a,b). The gauge matrix for down quark is (3,1). Therefore, helium 4 in terms of these matrices becomes 6(5,1)+6(3,1) or (30,6)+(18,6)=(48,12). Since the beta entry is not divisible by 8, helium 4 naturally appears in the gaseous state as 2(48,12) or (96,24). Transferring these double entries into the reaction, it becomes 2D+2D®2He+twice the output energy. This indicates that cold quark fusion needs four deuterons and suggests that the plasma particles of the Bose liquid must be exact multiples of 4 deuterons as a minimum requirement for fusion to occur. This means that the magnetic field configuration is that of quadrupole magnetic moments instead of the usual dipole moments. Pentapole, hexapole, heptapole, octapole and higher moments could also possibly establish stable configurations. Similar configurations have been implemented successfully in Penning traps http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penning_trap.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  2. #2
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    5,807
    Blog Entries
    62
    Thanks Given
    3,838
    Thanked 3,462x in 2,168 Posts
    Rep Power
    89

    Re: cold quark fusion

    Antonio, do you think quarks are small enough to qualify for a fundamental photonic substance___only? IYO, is the fundamental photonic substance, even smaller, or what do you think is the minimal sized particle, nearing the infinitesimal?

    Lloyd

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    The nuclear reaction for cold fusion is D+D®He+energy. In term of quarks: uud+uud+udd+udd®6u6d+energy. The gauge matrix for up quark is (5,1). The 5 is the alpha entry and the 1 is the beta entry of (a,b). The gauge matrix for down quark is (3,1). Therefore, helium 4 in terms of these matrices becomes 6(5,1)+6(3,1) or (30,6)+(18,6)=(48,12). Since the beta entry is not divisible by 8, helium 4 naturally appears in the gaseous state as 2(48,12) or (96,24). Transferring these double entries into the reaction, it becomes 2D+2D®2He+twice the output energy. This indicates that cold quark fusion needs four deuterons and suggests that the plasma particles of the Bose liquid must be exact multiples of 4 deuterons as a minimum requirement for fusion to occur. This means that the magnetic field configuration is that of quadrupole magnetic moments instead of the usual dipole moments. Pentapole, hexapole, heptapole, octapole and higher moments could also possibly establish stable configurations. Similar configurations have been implemented successfully in Penning traps http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penning_trap.
    "To develop the skill of correct thinking is in the first place to learn what you have to disregard. In order to go on, you have to know what to leave out; this is the essence of effective thinking." Kurt Godel
    "Time and space are modes in which we think and not conditions in which we live." Albert Einstein
    "The uncertainty principle is an absolute, finite, universal constant." L.G.
    "The tick-tick-tick of the caesium atom is a sliding-time-scaler constant of all finite universal motion." L.G.

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: cold quark fusion

    Quote Originally Posted by Lloyd Gillespie
    what do you think is the minimal sized particle, nearing the infinitesimal?
    If it is not the photon then it must be the neutrino. Both seem to travel at lightspeed.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: cold quark fusion

    We all want fusion,whether it be cold quark or otherwise,looking at the word fusion,
    blending-or uniting of different things into a whole,then look at the word synthesis,combining of seperate parts or elements to form a complex whole,there is little
    difference in the two words.

    Nature,naturally and within cyclic rhythm,produces both fusion and synthesis,all without
    the aid of a machine?

    We are a living laboratory,and can experiment within ourselves,I totally believe that
    fusion can be achieved within the human being,at room temperature,and with no harm
    what so ever to the individual involved.This can be accomplished by the person attaining
    and maintaining a state of Samhadi,now as to extracting energy from this state that could be used to run a factory or two,well thats another story!


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: cold quark fusion

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    well thats another story
    That's the story that I have always wanted to hear. If you happen to know of someone selling tickets to this lecture please do let me know. I'm afraid it would be soldout for the first 5 seconds of its announcement.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: cold quark fusion

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    That's the story that I have always wanted to hear. If you happen to know of someone selling tickets to this lecture please do let me know. I'm afraid it would be soldout for the first 5 seconds of its announcement.

    I will keep a sharp look out for that opportunity when it arises.


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Matter is everything in a void:
    By dleviwing in forum Forces of Nature
    Replies: 299
    Last Post: 07-11-2007, 08:03 AM
  2. hot or cold no one’s onions
    By AntonioLao in forum General Physics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-08-2006, 04:41 PM
  3. tau-catalyzed fusion
    By AntonioLao in forum General Physics
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-02-2006, 11:48 AM
  4. wanted: willing neutrinos for cold fusion
    By AntonioLao in forum General Physics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-24-2006, 12:37 PM
  5. Why we fail to see spin conservation in the quark realm:
    By Robert Duncan in forum Quantum Physics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-04-2005, 01:52 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top