[bottomlander]

Originally Posted by MJA

Hi Pat,

I think exercise is the essence of health, regardless of one's poor health.
Is it the lack of exercise that finds you in such a way?
I suggest walking; it does not matter how fast or how far, only that you do.
Perhaps because as you say: you are mostly at rest, to find a healthy balance you would mostly exercise when not resting.
I thought it sounded good anyway.


To your health,

=
MJA

Dear MJA,

Let's talk about both physical exercises (like walking) and intellectual exercises (like re-thinking).

Walking step by step is good. Yet for theory theorization, jumping to conclusions without enough steps is no good!
(Most readers observe that you, MJA, jumped to your conclusions without sufficient steps!)
That is why most people who read your works oppose your hasty conclusions.
(You yourself said that your Truth is now under the second stage, being seriously opposed.)

If you said you made steps already, then wrongly self-interpreted magic empty words are not steps, only subjective illusions!

Don't just use more magic empty words to argue with critical thinkers!
Also, there are too many available wisdom words to support any claims, even for erroneous claims.

Please re-think, do your own exercise!
Not just jump/ride to your own conclusions!

Best Regards. Bottomlander

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by Profpat

I agree with Michael on your thread Antonio, very interesting.

I'm a great believer in our freedom and I think it is exhibited at the smallest level, that being the asymptotic freedom of the quarks in the proton to the limited freedom you and I enjoy.

As far as choice at our level I try to follow Spike Lee's advice and "Do The Right Thing".( I think for the most part we all know right from wrong)

MJA: I follow the laws of enertia,(and since I'm mostly at rest) I'll ride rather then walk. But since I had 3 heart attacks I don't know if anybody should follow my practice of riding rather then walking.

Best to all,

Pat

Pat if you are able swimming is an excellent exorcise keeps you fit and cool at the same time.
I swim around a mile a day at the local pool,it has helped me no end.

regards michael.

[Profpat]

Thanks MJA for the advice.

I'm sure my cardiologists would agree with you.

I think it was the 40 years of smoking that did me in.
i quit 10 years ago. The lack of exercis might have been a contributing factor, as well as eating too much red meat, and diary products.

My best advice " IF YOU SMOKE QUIT " (end of preaching Robert.)

Well I think I'm going outside for a little random walk.

Best to all,

Pat

[theunify]

You have invariable left out one minor detail as always Antonio, you have only skimmed the surface. In order to arrive at the result you have predicted that light cones cannot exhibit motion in the opposite direction of time; you have forgot to disclaim that you are in fact part of the forward motion of matter and are biased against the idea of not existing.

Perhaps non-existance is biased toward us for existing. Quite mathematically however, your point is unprovable, or inherently false, for what are we really debating, you are saying there was no beginning, no null state from which we evolved, yet you have not proven that evolution does not exist... Or more accurately the ground state from which evolution is theorized to occur, most inevibatibly was a binary switch, and operated on the exact opposite genesis conditions that you have presuposed.

Originally Posted by AntonioLao

In one dimensional random walk the probability of axial motion in either of two directions is ½. In two dimensions having two axes of motion the probability is ¼. In three dimensions with three axes of motion the probability is 1/8. In four dimensions with four axes of motion the probability is 1/16. For n dimensions with n axes of motion the probability is ½ raised to the nth power. As n approaches infinity the probability of any axial motion approaches zero. When n is exactly infinity then all random walks stop. Since different states of motion exist n never actually reach infinity and consequently absolute rest is impossible. Therefore singularity is not real and big bang never happened in the past or in any other time. This logical sequence would then correctly invalidate the existence of relativistic light-cones and their empty graticules at (0, 0, 0, 0).

Note that the general expression for finding the probability of n-dimensional random walk is equivalent to the multiplicative factor for finding the amount of remaining radioisotopes using half-lives of radioactive decay. The varying half-lives of radioisotopes, some lasting billions of years, are also a good indication that absolute rest is impossible. Therefore life or death is just varying rates and directions of continuous random walks. It is natural to keep walking. To live forever is to keep walking along a straight (or curved) line. To die is to walk in the opposite direction. Since there are infinite number of lines and directions there are infinite ways to live or to die.

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by theunify

light cones cannot exhibit motion

The motion is strictly light speed. For light, time is always NOW, no past and no future.

[MJA]

Originally Posted by bottomlander

Dear MJA,

Let's talk about both physical exercises (like walking) and intellectual exercises (like re-thinking).

Walking step by step is good. Yet for theory theorization, jumping to conclusions without enough steps is no good!
(Most readers observe that you, MJA, jumped to your conclusions without sufficient steps!)
That is why most people who read your works oppose your hasty conclusions.
(You yourself said that your Truth is now under the second stage, being seriously opposed.)

If you said you made steps already, then wrongly self-interpreted magic empty words are not steps, only subjective illusions!

Don't just use more magic empty words to argue with critical thinkers!
Also, there are too many available wisdom words to support any claims, even for erroneous claims.

Please re-think, do your own exercise!
Not just jump/ride to your own conclusions!

Best Regards. Bottomlander

Dear Bottomlander,

WHAT?

Theory Theorization??? What is that?
Subjective illusions is magic words??? Like abra ka dabra, well I have never, have I? What words of mine do you find magic, I kind of like that?
Jumping to concluion without sufficent steps? How many steps are there to the truth?
I don't oppose my truth in any degree, do you?
Is that what you mean by critical thinker?
You have been critical, but as far as a thinker?
Magic words? Is it more like these words of yours: "theory theorization"? Is it the theory that you find illusionary, me too!
Is the wisdom word "truth" erronious?
Don't jump to my own conclusion? Who better than my own, yours?
As far as re thinking, I'm starting with you!

WOW

=
MJA

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao

The motion is strictly light speed. For light, time is always NOW, no past and no future.

Absolutely Antonio,now is the light frame,how could it be otherwise?




regards michael