It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Tools > Mathematics
Reload this Page square of HJ PDE
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
square of HJ PDE
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 72
   
square of HJ PDE - 07-29-2007, 03:18 PM

Appearing near the end of many advanced textbooks of analytical mechanics is the topic on a nonlinear Hamilton-Jacobi (HJ) partial differential equation (PDE). It highlighted theories on canonical and contact transformations. The word ‘canonical’ literally means the simplest, most symmetric, and of highest standard. Although for less fortunate investigators it becomes the most complex, most unreal, and the farthest from a norm. Furthermore, in many colleges and universities HJ PDE rarely lectured at the undergraduate or even graduate level. The excuses are always lack of time. However, two good reasons why many authors always delayed discussions till the last chapters are (1) lack of comprehensive understanding and (2) desire for continued independently self-motivated research. In this context it simply means preserving the forms of Hamilton’s canonical equations. The word ‘contact’ in accordance with Hamilton’s principle is the path independence between two fixed points at two fixed times such that the variation of the time integral of the Lagrangian is zero or stationary. The subtle differences are that the former implies invariance while the latter implies equality. The invariance is the multi-dimensional volume integral of Liouville’s theorem. The equality is the multi-dimensional path integral of Feynman’s theorem.

Feynman’s theorem suggests recasting Lagrange’s equations as initial force minus final force equal zero, Fi-Ff=0 or Fi=Ff. Liouville’s theorem suggests recasting HJ PDE as initial energy plus final energy equal zero, Ei+Ef=0 or Ei=-Ef. The 1st allows all possible values while the 2nd allows only the value of zero. Allowing all values of energy is simply to square both sides such that Ei=Ef is always true. For a quantized field theory, the variation of energy squares must satisfy the double time integrals:
H=òòdE²dtdt where dE²=dF1´dR1×dF2´dR2. When expanded by Lagrange’s identity these variations of generalized forces and generalized radius vectors give two variational topological structures: dH+=(dF1×dR2)(dF2×dR1)-(dF1×dF2)(dR2×dR1) and dH-=(dF1×dF2)(dR2×dR1)-(dF1×dR2)(dF2×dR1) whose variations are dH+=0 and dH-=0 such that dH=(dH+)+(dH-)=0. For single time integral these become true differential forms. Note that H+ and H- become real valued constants if and only if either dF1×dF2=0 or dR1×dR2=0. The latter is equivalent to the square of the space-time interval of special relativity and the former is equivalent to the Gaussian and mean curvatures of these topological structures. By matrix descriptions, quantum mechanics use dR1×dR2 to represent the square of the wave function for probability amplitude while in general relativity, dF1×dF2 is used to represent the metric tensor.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
fair and square AntonioLao Mathematics 4 07-08-2007 03:01 PM
Is the "inverse square of the distance" a principle or a "party joke"...? humanbydefault Your TOE Theory 6 04-30-2006 07:34 PM
making waves by 3C AntonioLao General Physics 7 02-06-2006 11:47 AM
pulleys, dollies, workaholies AntonioLao Forces of Nature 6 02-06-2006 11:43 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com