You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
MOND theory could possibly replace dark matter and dark energy. However, the mainstream physics of cosmology followed the direction along classical general relativity (GR) and just beginning to incorporate Standard Model of elementary particles and high energy. Nonetheless, on March 25, 2004, a paper from Physical Review Letters D titled ‘Relativistic Gravitation Theory for the MOND Paradigm’ was written by Jacob Bekenstein http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Bekenstein. He incorporated Einstein’s GR mathematics such as tensor, vector, and scalar which described how matter and energy interact with space-time. This new theory is called TeVeS: an acronym for tensor, vector, and scalar. However, if these tensors could be replaced by Hadamard matrices of a theory of quantum space-time (TQS) then a MOND theory would necessarily become a theory of space-time charges: H+ and H- and their relationship to a generalized absolute acceleration.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Re: math of MOND -
11-27-2007, 03:33 PM
Linear Mode
