Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    glueball or gluestick?

    As fundamental building blocks of matter and energy, space-time charges can appear as color charges, electric charges, electromagnetic charges, weak charges, and gravity charges called gravitons. The 3rd and the 4th are now combined into electroweak charges called photon, W+, W-, and Z0. All of these different types of space-time charges can be rearranged and grouped together relative to each other. Furthermore, each level of rearrangements constitutes a specified energy of excitations. At present, only three intermediate levels can be experimentally measured: molecular, atomic, and nuclear. The outermost level of attractive gravity rules by the gravitons is extremely weak to allow detection by current technology. The innermost level of antigravity is extremely strong to hinder gluons separation by any advanced accelerator technology.

    At the molecular level, the energy of excitation is merely a fraction of an electron volt. At the atomic level, it is a few electron volts. At the nuclear level, the energy of excitation is more than a million electron volts. Keeping these differences in mind, it is plausible that the resonance energy of excitation for detecting a graviton is practically zero while that of gluons is practically infinite.

    If it is possible for a glueball to transform into a gluestick then into a gluering then into a gluechain, this is equivalent to the transformation of a tensor into a Hopf ring with properties of Möbius topology of compactification of infinity to zero energy of excitation. Nevertheless, the peculiarity remains why both the theoretical mass of the graviton and the theoretical mass of the gluon is zero. This only makes sense if the theoretical mass is related to experimental detection such that infinite mass and zero mass cannot be practically measured.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    MJA
    MJA is offline
    9th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    1,745
    Thanks Given
    113
    Thanked 154x in 101 Posts
    Rep Power
    40

    Re: glueball or gluestick?

    You are Radical AL, Thanks.

    =
    MJA

    What has zero mass, nothing?
    The truth of everything is less than one inch,
    it is only equal and the lion is one.
    One is free when the door is opened,
    education has the key.
    =

  3. #3
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: glueball or gluestick?

    Put simply Antonio,what are you saying here!And furthermore will this open a doorway
    to cold fusion?



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  4. #4
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: glueball or gluestick?

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    will this open a doorway to cold fusion?
    This could serve as an angle of attack to cold fusion. Maybe not a plane angle but more like a solid angle, that is to say steradian over radian.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top