Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    real or imaginary reciprocity

    Both rationals and irrationals possess reciprocals. The definition is simply the product of a real number r by its reciprocal 1/r such that the answer is the identity of multiplication. However, the graph of a reciprocal function f(x)=1/x is equivalent to the graph of an inverse variation such that if the function is y then the product of xy=k is a constant k. On the other hand, the general equation of a conic is a second degree equation given by Ax+Bxy+Cy+Dx+Ey+F=0, where A, B, C, D, E, F are real numbers and A, B, C are not all zero. If A=C=F=0, B=D=1, and E=-1 then the equation is reduced to xy=y-x. Solving for y gives the rational function y=x/(1-x). However, if A=C=D=E=0 then Bxy+F=0 is equivalent to xy=k where k=F/B.

    The analysis of both of these functions: xy=k and y=x/(1-x) by graphical calculations suggested strong implication of real reciprocity between zero and infinity versus unity and infinity. Nonetheless only the function xy=y-x could give the singular isolated solution where x and y are both zero.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: real or imaginary reciprocity

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Both rationals and irrationals possess reciprocals. The definition is simply the product of a real number r by its reciprocal 1/r such that the answer is the identity of multiplication. However, the graph of a reciprocal function f(x)=1/x is equivalent to the graph of an inverse variation such that if the function is y then the product of xy=k is a constant k. On the other hand, the general equation of a conic is a second degree equation given by Ax+Bxy+Cy+Dx+Ey+F=0, where A, B, C, D, E, F are real numbers and A, B, C are not all zero. If A=C=F=0, B=D=1, and E=-1 then the equation is reduced to xy=y-x. Solving for y gives the rational function y=x/(1-x). However, if A=C=D=E=0 then Bxy+F=0 is equivalent to xy=k where k=F/B.

    The analysis of both of these functions: xy=k and y=x/(1-x) by graphical calculations suggested strong implication of real reciprocity between zero and infinity versus unity and infinity. Nonetheless only the function xy=y-x could give the singular isolated solution where x and y are both zero.
    We need a "real" point of entry here I feel.imaginary will not cut the mustard!

    To gain a foothold on mobius we must be "real".


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: real or imaginary reciprocity

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    To gain a foothold on mobius
    But its physical dimension is less than three dimensional?
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: real or imaginary reciprocity

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    But its physical dimension is less than three dimensional?

    Don't fret there is a way,I can feel it in my water!



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: real or imaginary reciprocity

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    Don't fret there is a way
    The only way I'm suggesting is to stop the flow of time. Once time is stopped then infinite consciousness is realized.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: real or imaginary reciprocity

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    The only way I'm suggesting is to stop the flow of time. Once time is stopped then infinite consciousness is realized.
    Exactly and with infinite consciousness in the driving seat,all becomes realizable.


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top