Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    e-golden analysis

    The analysis of the inverse function f(x)=1/x and the rational function g(x)=x/(1+x) suggests their natural golden connection to the natural base of logarithm, e. This base is used practically everywhere in the formulations of scientific discoveries for both field and particle theory even in the growth and decay of living things. In quadratic forms, the golden mean can be written as x+x-1=0 if x is less than unity or as x-x-1=0 if x is greater than unity. Equivalently, the first is given by equating (1/x)=x+1 and the second is given by equating (1/x)=x/(1+x). However, equating (x+1)= x/(1+x) would not make any sense unless x is complex. Nonetheless, (1/x)=x/(1+x) is simply the same as equating f(x)= g(x).

    Further analyses give the following results: (1) the derivative of f(x) is -1/x (2) the derivative of g(x) is 1/(1+x) (3) the limit of f(x) as x®0 is undefined (4) the limit of g(x) as x®0 is zero (5) the limit of f(x) as x®infinity is zero (6) the limit of g(x) as x®infinity is unity (7) the integral of f(x) is ln|x| ( the integral of g(x) is x-ln|1+x|. Coincidently or maybe not, the clincher is that the natural base of logarithm is defined as the limit of the x-power of the reciprocal of g(x) as x®infinity.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: e-golden analysis

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    The analysis of the inverse function f(x)=1/x and the rational function g(x)=x/(1+x) suggests their natural golden connection to the natural base of logarithm, e. This base is used practically everywhere in the formulations of scientific discoveries for both field and particle theory even in the growth and decay of living things. In quadratic forms, the golden mean can be written as x+x-1=0 if x is less than unity or as x-x-1=0 if x is greater than unity. Equivalently, the first is given by equating (1/x)=x+1 and the second is given by equating (1/x)=x/(1+x). However, equating (x+1)= x/(1+x) would not make any sense unless x is complex. Nonetheless, (1/x)=x/(1+x) is simply the same as equating f(x)= g(x).

    Further analyses give the following results: (1) the derivative of f(x) is -1/x (2) the derivative of g(x) is 1/(1+x) (3) the limit of f(x) as x®0 is undefined (4) the limit of g(x) as x®0 is zero (5) the limit of f(x) as x®infinity is zero (6) the limit of g(x) as x®infinity is unity (7) the integral of f(x) is ln|x| ( the integral of g(x) is x-ln|1+x|. Coincidently or maybe not, the clincher is that the natural base of logarithm is defined as the limit of the x-power of the reciprocal of g(x) as x®infinity.

    You took the words right out of my mouth here,remarkable?
    Now when this is "toned down will it reveal an opening?

    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: e-golden analysis

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    will it reveal an opening
    I'm still holding to the fact that there was never an opening. It is just our complicated thoughts that close them down and shut them up. The answers are right under our noses.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: e-golden analysis

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    I'm still holding to the fact that there was never an opening. It is just our complicated thoughts that close them down and shut them up. The answers are right under our noses.
    Prehaps we are already within it (our consciousness) and we see it not?



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: e-golden analysis

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    we are already within it
    If it is a Moebius topology then there is no inside or outside. The convoluted topology makes it appears that there is inside and outside. But the linkage of the topology is mathematically real.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: e-golden analysis

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    If it is a Moebius topology then there is no inside or outside. The convoluted topology makes it appears that there is inside and outside. But the linkage of the topology is mathematically real.

    Then we need to somehow got into transcendant mode and gain access that way!




    regards michael
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  7. #7
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: e-golden analysis

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    into transcendant mode
    That means you got to have the pie and eat it too since pi is the only irrational transcendental real number found in nature. Maybe I wrong but any professional mathematician would prove it otherwise.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  8. #8
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: e-golden analysis

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    That means you got to have the pie and eat it too since pi is the only irrational transcendental real number found in nature. Maybe I wrong but any professional mathematician would prove it otherwise.

    In real terms though,many do just that,have the pie and eat it too?Prehaps there
    is a fundamental error in the way we understand this? Think beyond maths-into
    full and total unification.



    regards michael
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  9. #9
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: e-golden analysis

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    have the pie and eat it too
    Can't remember this ever happened to me. On the other hand, if ever I ate a pie with the Golden Divine Proportion built-in then I should probably live forever and never get hungry again.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  10. #10
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: e-golden analysis

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Can't remember this ever happened to me. On the other hand, if ever I ate a pie with the Golden Divine Proportion built-in then I should probably live forever and never get hungry again.

    Ambrosia was the food of the Gods,I am sure if you ate that hunger would never
    visit you again!



    regards michael
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

 

 
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top