| |
 | |
 | |
Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
02-08-2008, 12:54 PM
| | Re: differential domain
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick I am near the source here | I know for sure that Newton and Maxwell were both born in the vicinity and Einstein is just a stone throw away?
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 7,749
| |
02-08-2008, 12:58 PM
|  Re: differential domain
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao  I know for sure that Newton and Maxwell were both born in the vicinity and Einstein is just a stone throw away? |
Prehaps we could hold a seance and see if we could contact Einstein and ask him
if he has any ideas to share with us!
regards michael.
__________________
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
02-08-2008, 01:06 PM
| | Re: differential domain
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick we could hold a seance and see if we could contact Einstein | I already know what he going to say and that is: the universe is deterministic not probabilistic as what quantum field physicists would say. Einstein said that GOD does not play any game of chance. On the other hand, if Bohr can be contacted he would say just the opposite.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 7,749
| |
02-08-2008, 01:09 PM
| Re: differential domain
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao I already know what he going to say and that is: the universe is deterministic not probabilistic as what quantum field physicists would say. Einstein said that GOD does not play any game of chance. On the other hand, if Bohr can be contacted he would say just the opposite. |
Well then looks like it is back to the drawing board then.
regards michael.
__________________
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | | | | Grandmaster
Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 3,778
| |
02-08-2008, 01:09 PM
| | Re: differential domain
Domains are an interesting subject. There does't appear to be any limit to their size. I guess the smallest would be the quark and the largest would be the universe itself. Do you know if there is any domain smaller than a quark Antonio?
Best to all,
Pat | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
02-08-2008, 01:14 PM
| | Re: differential domain
Quote: |
Originally Posted by Profpat Do you know if there is any domain smaller than a quark | The gluons since they are responsible for binding the quarks together.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
02-08-2008, 01:17 PM
| | Re: differential domain
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick back to the drawing board then | All the drawing boards ever constructed are all now being used by very smart theorists of international calibre. We have to wait patiently for our turn.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 7,749
| |
02-08-2008, 01:24 PM
| Re: differential domain
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao All the drawing boards ever constructed are all now being used by very smart theorists of international calibre. We have to wait patiently for our turn. |
Our turn in the barrel is approaching,we have to be bold and break down the barriers.
regards michael.
__________________
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | | | | Grandmaster
Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 3,778
| |
02-08-2008, 01:29 PM
| | Re: differential domain
Well I guess the gluons would be smaller, though personally I have my own doubts of their existence.
BTW are you guys afor probability or determinism? Probability has my vote.
Best,
Pat | | | | Grandmaster
Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 3,778
| |
02-08-2008, 07:56 PM
| | Re: differential domain
 Couldn't the gluons be the colored areas of the Venn diagram. The 8th gluon would be the black area embracing the quarks. It appears the gluons are holding together the 3 quarks, but in fact the 3 quarks are creating those areas. Just a thought and I would appreciate your feedback on this. Best to you, Pat | | | | | |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:56 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 
VBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys.
| |
