| | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 80 | differential domain -
02-07-2008, 12:17 PM
An integral domain is a mathematical system to which certain postulates hold exclusively for this particular system in question. For example, the system of positive and negative integers: 0, ±1, ±2, ±3, ±4, ±5, ±6, ±7, ±8, …, to infinity. They hold the following postulates: (1) closure, (2) uniqueness, (3) commutative laws, (4) associative laws, (5) distributive law, (6) zero, (7) unity, ( additive inverse, and (9) cancellation law. On the other hand, a differential domain is a system of Hadamard matrices. Moreover, the postulates for this system only apply for matrices of equivalent level of existence (LOE). Analogous to the properties held by an abstract ring structure, a differential domain is closed under the operations of addition and multiplications and that is an Abelian group with respect to addition and an associative semigroup with respect to multiplication and in which the distributive laws relating the two operations hold. For matrices A, B, I, and O at LOE=2 where I is the identity matrix and O is the zero matrix, one of the unique properties is AB=2B=B-A if and only if A+B=O. However, for single element matrices A=-1, I=B=1, and O=0 such that AB= -1, while B-A=2=1-(-1) the property does not hold.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| |
|  | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,477
Thanks Given: 369
Thanked 791x in 727 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 98 |  Re: differential domain -
02-07-2008, 12:36 PM
Is there any way to unite all these differentials? We need a way into fusions boudoir!
regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 80 | Re: differential domain -
02-07-2008, 12:40 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Is there any way to unite all these differentials | Yes. The method can be found in the integral calculus and it is called the method of antiderivatives.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,477
Thanks Given: 369
Thanked 791x in 727 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 98 | Re: differential domain -
02-07-2008, 12:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao  Yes. The method can be found in the integral calculus and it is called the method of antiderivatives. |
I think we are well on our way to"cutting the mustard" here Antonio!
regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | The Following User Says Thank You to mkirkpatrick For This Useful Post: | | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 80 | Re: differential domain -
02-07-2008, 12:51 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick we are well on our way to"cutting the mustard" | Nor quite ready to pop the champagne cork yet, I found out recently that derivative and antiderivative contain a certain broken gauge symmetry. I can only describe these more clearly using the method of calculus.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,477
Thanks Given: 369
Thanked 791x in 727 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 98 | Re: differential domain -
02-07-2008, 12:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao Nor quite ready to pop the champagne cork yet, I found out recently that derivative and antiderivative contain a certain broken gauge symmetry. I can only describe these more clearly using the method of calculus. |
Well we will keep it on ice! The dawning is almost upon us.
regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | The Following User Says Thank You to mkirkpatrick For This Useful Post: | | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 80 | Re: differential domain -
02-07-2008, 01:01 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick we will keep it on ice | Just hoping that the room temperature is not warm enough to melt the ice in less than a microsecond. But if time does not exist we need not worry.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,477
Thanks Given: 369
Thanked 791x in 727 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 98 | Re: differential domain -
02-07-2008, 01:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao Just hoping that the room temperature is not warm enough to melt the ice in less than a microsecond. But if time does not exist we need not worry. | I am just a little concerned,but also hopeful
regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | The Following User Says Thank You to mkirkpatrick For This Useful Post: | | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 80 | Re: differential domain -
02-07-2008, 01:17 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick I am just a little concerned,but also hopeful | More so if the global warming is truly escalating as what scientists wanted us to believe?
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,477
Thanks Given: 369
Thanked 791x in 727 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 98 | Re: differential domain -
02-07-2008, 01:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao More so if the global warming is truly escalating as what scientists wanted us to believe? |
Global warming is heading for a meltdown!
regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | The Following User Says Thank You to mkirkpatrick For This Useful Post: | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | | | |
