Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    triple double not single

    From study of vector space approach to geometry, it was determined that volume (triple) and area (double) may be considered independently of the metric properties of length (single).

    Mathematical logic conclusively suggests that the degree of physical invariance is higher for volume than it is for area. That of area is higher than it is for length. For example changes of length as a triangle is deformed would still allow its area to remain constant even if any two of three sides are stretched to infinity. The change in space-time (universal expansion) and location of matter (position and velocity) would still allow the size and volume (mass and density) of each individual particle to remain constant within relativistic limits.

    This latter implication together with a principle of least action led to a surprisingly simple conclusion to the question: why an electron and conceivably all other elementary particles appear point-like, minimizing their physical volumes as the highest triple invariance of nature.

    Equivalently, the volume determinants for both positive and negative is equal to the scalar triple product of vector analysis: A´B×C where A, B, and C are vectors defined in Euclidean 3-space. Furthermore, the same can be extended to 4 dimensions space-time or to 11 dimensions superstring. In fact, it can extend arbitrarily to infinite dimensions. However, all these higher dimensions are not really necessary for the conservation of volume triple invariance of perfect symmetry. It is a fact of life that no baseball hitters ever hit a quadruple unless playing on a pentagon instead of a diamond or a strong golfer scoring triple eagle on a par 5 course.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: triple double not single

    You have something up your sleeve here,i can feel it!


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: triple double not single

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    something up your sleeve here
    Firstly, to fully understand why symmetric Hadamard square matrices have zero determinants. Secondly, to initiate cold fusion.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,621
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: triple double not single

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Firstly, to fully understand why symmetric Hadamard square matrices have zero determinants. Secondly, to initiate cold fusion.

    I just knew cold fusion was "lurking" there in the background!




    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top