Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Tools > Mathematics
Reload this Page 0.999...=1
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Re: 0.999...=1
Old
  (#11 (permalink))
9th degree Black Belt
N0B0DY has a spectacular aura about
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,941
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 110x in 104 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rep Power: 27
   
Re: 0.999...=1 - 02-15-2008, 11:11 AM

"Pat, that example is incorrect since there are INFINITELY many 9's, thus mutliplying by ten must yield 9.9999..."

I took this from the Shout Box if that is okay. I was wondering what mathematical means you would propose, Neutralino, for the quantum jump above, if we know that numbers exist between numbers continuously, there doesn't seem to be a case whereby we could justifiably make that arbitrary discrete jump.

I think pursuing this might lead to a simplified QM understanding because we have a fubar mix of continuity and discretness, in the sense that we can use either one as each other to satisfy both: an infinite number of discrete units continuing forever; one absolute unit; an eternal continuation of one unit; and the absolute decimal point.

If we multiply .999... by 10, then we multiply 1.000... by 10, we get 9.999... and 10.000... Are we therein not in the identical boat?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: 0.999...=1
Old
  (#12 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,317
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 123x in 121 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
Re: 0.999...=1 - 02-15-2008, 12:42 PM

Infinite series are good and useful as far as they are proven to be convergence and laid the foundation for the mathematics of infinitesimal calculus: differential and integral. But the fact is there are more divergence series than there are convergence. That is why the theory of limits is only applicable to an uncountable real domain of applicability. It's applicability to the complex imaginary domain is questionable since infinity is defined in complex analysis as the largest complex imaginary number at the north pole of Riemann complex sphere.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to AntonioLao For This Useful Post:
Profpat (02-15-2008)
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com