Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
| | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,109
Thanks Given: 641
Thanked 97x in 96 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 71 | imaginary equations -
02-15-2008, 12:18 PM
At the heart or gut of quantum mechanics is Schrödinger wave equation. However, its successful descriptions of atomic spectra do not justify ignoring or taking for granted the undeniable fact that it is absolutely an imaginary equation. It would be more or less forgettable or forgivable if it is simply an imaginary or real inequality analogous to the uncertainty expressions DxDp≥h or DtDE≥h. Furthermore, when Dirac extended it into his relativistic wave equation, he made it even more imaginary by introducing zero metric spinors. Fortunately, Dirac equation surpasses the successes of Schrödinger wave equation. For one important thing, it predicted the existence of antimatter. However, the wavefunction Y remains in the shadowy realm of imagination. So far, all attempts to break its imaginary walls failed miserably. Back in 1926, Max Born’s probabilistic interpretation of Y into a probability wavefunction allows accurate measurements for the absolute squares of the conjugate product |Y*Y| requiring only normalization of its integral ò¶|Y*Y|=1. Today, if |Y*Y| describes the 4th power of complex imaginary then the best measured outcomes are all negative real numbers. On the other hand, its 8th power descriptions |Y*Y| can measure all but positive real numbers. These would be helpful in eliminating all physical concepts of dark matter, dark energy, graviton, Higgs boson, magnetic monopole, gluon, axion, tachyon, and all supersymmetric particles. Most of all is to initiate the downfall of all superstring theories, rendering them unnecessary for further formulations of physical theories and delivering them into the heap of everlasting oblivion. Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c² | |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,203
Thanks Given: 335
Thanked 617x in 591 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 90 | Re: imaginary equations -
02-15-2008, 12:25 PM
Surely all equations are of and from the mind-thereby imaginary?
regards michael. Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | | | | Grandmaster
Status: Offline Posts: 3,048
Thanks Given: 282
Thanked 494x in 453 Posts
Join Date: May 2007 Rep Power: 44 | Re: imaginary equations -
02-15-2008, 12:46 PM
These would be helpful in eliminating all physical concepts of dark matter, dark energy, graviton, Higgs boson, magnetic monopole, gluon, axion, tachyon, and all supersymmetric particles. Most of all is to initiate the downfall of all superstring theories, rendering them unnecessary for further formulations of physical theories and delivering them into the heap of everlasting oblivion.
I have no problem eliminating all the above, but my Idea requires strings or a one dimensional entity to start things off. Though they don't have to be superstrings regular strings would work fine.
Best,
Pat | |
| | | The Following User Says Thank You to Profpat For This Useful Post: | | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,109
Thanks Given: 641
Thanked 97x in 96 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 71 | Re: imaginary equations -
02-15-2008, 12:53 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by Profpat regular strings would work fine. | But of course there is always a better and quicker way to skin a cat. However, human nature always allow traveling along the hardest path to salvation and resisting the easiest and simplest shortcut by turning around walking the opposite direction, admitting that one has mistaken at the outset. Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c² | |
| | | | | | Grandmaster
Status: Offline Posts: 3,048
Thanks Given: 282
Thanked 494x in 453 Posts
Join Date: May 2007 Rep Power: 44 | Re: imaginary equations -
02-15-2008, 12:58 PM
I'm with nature on following the path of least resistence. Did you just kill Shrodingers cat. Thanks for your reply on .999...=1. As always confusing but insightful.
Last edited by Profpat : 02-15-2008 at 12:59 PM.
Reason: spelling
| |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,203
Thanks Given: 335
Thanked 617x in 591 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 90 | Re: imaginary equations -
02-15-2008, 12:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao But of course there is always a better and quicker way to skin a cat. However, human nature always allow traveling along the hardest path to salvation and resisting the easiest and simplest shortcut by turning around walking the opposite direction, admitting that one has mistaken at the outset. |
That's about the size of it,said the actress to the bishop,sorry,wrong thread!
regards michael. Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,109
Thanks Given: 641
Thanked 97x in 96 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 71 | Re: imaginary equations -
02-15-2008, 01:08 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by Profpat Did you just kill Shrodingers cat. | Actually, I release it from imprisonment in the blackbody cubicle of pure imaginary walls. In any case, it was a kitten then now it's a roaring vicious mad and angry fearful tiger of perfect symmetry for being trapped for many billion years. Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c² | |
| | | | | | Grandmaster
Status: Offline Posts: 3,048
Thanks Given: 282
Thanked 494x in 453 Posts
Join Date: May 2007 Rep Power: 44 | Re: imaginary equations -
02-15-2008, 01:13 PM
I thought the good doctor put the cat in the hat (oops) box ~70 years ago. Of course that would be ~ 500 cat years. | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,109
Thanks Given: 641
Thanked 97x in 96 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 71 | Re: imaginary equations -
02-15-2008, 01:20 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by Profpat Of course that would be ~ 500 cat years. | Since cats have nine lives 500 to the power 9 would be 1 950 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 years! Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c² | |
| | | | | | Grandmaster
Status: Offline Posts: 3,048
Thanks Given: 282
Thanked 494x in 453 Posts
Join Date: May 2007 Rep Power: 44 | Re: imaginary equations -
02-15-2008, 01:24 PM
LOL Ok no more math arguments with a mathematican | |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com | |