Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
| | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,109
Thanks Given: 641
Thanked 97x in 96 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 71 | Is 1995 perfect? -
02-25-2008, 03:05 PM
The May, 1995, issue of Annals of Mathematics contained the final resting place of Fermat’s last theorem. After this date, few or none at all, would there be mathematicians’ labor on formulating a proof, maybe a more elegant one than that of Wiles. The existence of the top quark was experimentally verified in 1995 at Fermilab, located in Batavia near Chicago, Illinois. The collider is the TEVATRON using proton-antiproton collision. The prime factors of the number 1995 are 3, 5, 7, and 19. However, the prime ideal factors of 3 are (1+√2i)(1-√2i). The prime ideals of 5 are (1+2i)(1-2i) or (2+i)(2-i). That of 7 are (1+√6i)(1-√6i) or (2+√3i)(2-√3i), and that of 19 are (1+√18i)(1-√18i) or (2+√15i)(2-√15i) or (3+√10i)(3-√10i) or (4+√3i)(4-√3i). On the other hand, mathematicians define perfect numbers as numbers whose factors sum are equal to the number themselves, for example, the factors of 6 are 1, 2, 3, and their sum is also 6. Another perfect number is 28. Its factors are 1, 2, 4, 7, and 14 whose sum is also 28. The prime ideal factors of 6 are (1+√5i)(1-√5i) or (2+√2i)(2-√2i) whose sum is also 6. The ideal factors of 28 are (1+√26i)(1-√26i) or (2+√24i)(2-√24i) or (3+√19i)(3-√19i) or (4+√12i)(4-√12i) or (5+√3i)(5-√3i) whose sum is 30, since 30≠28, 28 is not a perfect number in the complex domain. Therefore, taking both real and complex ideal prime factors only the real number 6 could really be considered as a truly perfect number. Coincidentally, the square ratio of 6x6 square singular Hadamard matrices for proton to electron is the product of 2 and the 8th power of 6 whose square root is approximately the mass ratio of proton to electron. Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c² | |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,203
Thanks Given: 335
Thanked 617x in 591 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 90 | Re: Is 1995 perfect? -
02-25-2008, 03:12 PM
I can "see" six as a perfect number,it is the symmetry of Ying and Yang,3=the outer balance,and 3= the inner balance making six in all.
regards michael. Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,109
Thanks Given: 641
Thanked 97x in 96 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 71 | Re: Is 1995 perfect? -
02-25-2008, 03:44 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick it is the symmetry | The perfect symmetry ofa hexagon. Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c² | |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,203
Thanks Given: 335
Thanked 617x in 591 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 90 | Re: Is 1995 perfect? -
02-25-2008, 03:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao The perfect symmetry ofa hexagon. |
Absolutely my friend,if it is good enough for bees,then it is good enough for me! What
do bees know that we don't?
regards michael. Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | The Following User Says Thank You to mkirkpatrick For This Useful Post: | | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,109
Thanks Given: 641
Thanked 97x in 96 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 71 | Re: Is 1995 perfect? -
02-25-2008, 03:57 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick What do bees know that we don't? | They been around since the creation of life on earth. They could participated in the actual design of natural selection since they are living fossil that never evolved. Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c² | |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,203
Thanks Given: 335
Thanked 617x in 591 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 90 | Re: Is 1995 perfect? -
02-25-2008, 05:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao They been around since the creation of life on earth. They could participated in the actual design of natural selection since they are living fossil that never evolved. |
What before the dinosaurs? I had not realized this! Will check it out.
regards michael. Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,109
Thanks Given: 641
Thanked 97x in 96 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 71 | Re: Is 1995 perfect? -
02-26-2008, 11:49 AM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick What before the dinosaurs? | I don't know. I will also check this out. Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c² | |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,203
Thanks Given: 335
Thanked 617x in 591 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 90 | Re: Is 1995 perfect? -
02-26-2008, 11:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao I don't know. I will also check this out. |
I have a feeling that mr bee came after the demise of the dinosuar,not 100%
though.
regards michael. Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,109
Thanks Given: 641
Thanked 97x in 96 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 71 | Re: Is 1995 perfect? -
02-26-2008, 12:32 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick bee came after the demise of the dinosuar | Those might be the honey bees or could they be the killer bees? Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c² | |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,203
Thanks Given: 335
Thanked 617x in 591 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 90 | Re: Is 1995 perfect? -
02-26-2008, 12:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao Those might be the honey bees or could they be the killer bees? |
Killer bees make honey too,then they kill you as you collect it!
regards michael. Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | The Following User Says Thank You to mkirkpatrick For This Useful Post: | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by v | |