Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
| | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,205
Thanks Given: 679
Thanked 111x in 110 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 73 | toot -
03-11-2008, 11:47 AM
A theory of ‘of theory’ (toot) would be no theory at all. It is similar to a guess of a guess, a dream of a dream, a thought of a thought, or a reflection of a reflection. In logic, a no is a no. But a no and a no is a yes while a no, a no, and a no is a no and a no, a no, a no, and a no is again a yes. The recurring patterns are that odd number of no is a no and even number of no is a yes. On the other hand, any number, even or odd, of a yes is always a yes. However, in mathematical transformations, a parallel reflection of a parallel reflection is the same as the inverse transformation of an inverse or the reciprocal of a reciprocal. All these indicate no transformations at all signifying a perfect symmetry. If no is represented by -1 and yes is unity then a Boolean algebra exists. It is analogous to the binary number system used in computer science represented by the binary digits 0 and 1. Its multi-dimensional representations would be described by certain Hadamard algebra using singular square symmetric Hadamard matrices. A point transformation of -1 and 1 generates the ring of integers under the operation of addition. Under the operation of multiplication, this ring solely generates the cyclic values of -1 and 1. A linear vector transformation using the row or column vector basis: (1,1), (-1,-1), (1,-1), and (-1,1) generates arbitrary vector (a, b) where both a and b are integers. This would also include the linearly independent vectors: (0,0), (1,0), (-1,0), (0,1), and (0,-1) under scalar multiplication. Nevertheless, only linear vector-matrix multiplication can generate singular square symmetric Hadamard matrices. These serve as a geometric explanation for LASER amplifications and oscillations and also a starting point for a theory of collimated holographic consciousness. Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛ | |
| | | | | | Grandmaster
Status: Offline Posts: 3,091
Thanks Given: 293
Thanked 507x in 466 Posts
Join Date: May 2007 Rep Power: 45 | Re: toot -
03-11-2008, 12:49 PM
How about a "HOOT " a hypothesis of of a theory, or maybe a " HOTIE " a hypothesis of a theory including everything. Best, Pat | |
| | | The Following User Says Thank You to Profpat For This Useful Post: | | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,252
Thanks Given: 337
Thanked 643x in 614 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 91 | Re: toot -
03-11-2008, 01:08 PM
I give a toot about tot theory of thing-tot,so with another 0 you have another theory,how
many theories make a real thing?And are real thing,more real than real things?Hell I am
getting confused here.
regards michael. Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | The Following User Says Thank You to mkirkpatrick For This Useful Post: | | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,205
Thanks Given: 679
Thanked 111x in 110 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 73 | Re: toot -
03-11-2008, 01:43 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by Profpat or maybe a " HOTIE " | Used to hangout at Hooters, I think some of their waitresses are hotter than those buffalo wings. Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick how many theories make a real thing | At least the product of 4 imaginary ones. Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛ | |
| | | | | | Grandmaster
Status: Offline Posts: 3,091
Thanks Given: 293
Thanked 507x in 466 Posts
Join Date: May 2007 Rep Power: 45 | Re: toot -
03-11-2008, 01:58 PM
I actually had one live with me, and they are. Best, Pat | |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,252
Thanks Given: 337
Thanked 643x in 614 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 91 | Re: toot -
03-11-2008, 02:05 PM
Let's give a hoot for the toot before we shoot the rapids of mindful equations of allness.
regards michael. Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | | | | Grandmaster
Status: Offline Posts: 3,091
Thanks Given: 293
Thanked 507x in 466 Posts
Join Date: May 2007 Rep Power: 45 | Re: toot -
03-11-2008, 02:16 PM
Thats cute, but rather moot if we get the boot down the rapids, in our zoot suit. | |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,252
Thanks Given: 337
Thanked 643x in 614 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 91 | Re: toot -
03-11-2008, 02:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Profpat Thats cute, but rather moot if we get the boot down the rapids, in our zoot suit. |
You are awful,but I like you!(Dick Emery)british comedian.
regards michael. Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,205
Thanks Given: 679
Thanked 111x in 110 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 73 | Re: toot -
03-11-2008, 02:51 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by Profpat I actually had one live with me | You are lucky. So what finally breaks the attachment? You don't have to answer if this sounds a bit personal. Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛ | |
| | | | | | Grandmaster
Status: Offline Posts: 3,091
Thanks Given: 293
Thanked 507x in 466 Posts
Join Date: May 2007 Rep Power: 45 | Re: toot -
03-11-2008, 02:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao You are lucky. So what finally breaks the attachment? You don't have to answer if this sounds a bit personal. | It was a really good relationship. She would live with me for ~ 6 months and then leave. She did this same thing over a period of 5 years. 2 years ago she moved to Phoenix because she has family there and never returned. I did see her in San Diego this Christmas when I saw my children. I put her up at the Hardrock Hotel and stayed with there while she was there. I told her she could always move back with me, but she said only when I move to California. I now live in the Detroit area and she is no dummy. I think I'll love her also forever. It's easy to do when you are not living together. I think that is why we got along so well. 6 months on 6months off. Thanks for asking. | |
| | | The Following User Says Thank You to Profpat For This Useful Post: | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | |